Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13682

in Rodman, New YorkPopulation 854

54.09/ 100

Ranked #10,584 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #1,131 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #25 of 36 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY ZIPs (bottom 31%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

1.5 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US10th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.5%

in the bottom 14.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US14th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

39.2%

in the top 31% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US69th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Rodman, New York (ZIP 13682), in overall standing, comes out in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,584th) and the bottom 35% of New York (1,131st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Modeled extreme heat resides at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise sits at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the bottom 13.3% nationally, and arsenic resides in the bottom 14.3% nationally. Modeled mammography sits in the top 13.6% nationally, and humid heat stands in the bottom 16% nationally. Against that, walkability resides in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and modeled binge drinking sits in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled short sleep stands in the top 9.2% nationally.

Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 13605, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 97%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 99%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.1%26.2–32.1
High blood pressure among adults33.2%30.0–36.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%7.9–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.9%6.7–9.3
Depression among adults21.3%18.5–24.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.6–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%31.7–38.6
Obesity among adults39.2%34.2–44.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.7%8.0–11.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.0%4.7–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.8%72.7–78.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.6–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults87.9%85.9–89.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.4%65.1–73.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.0%57.7–64.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%74.0–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.7%16.8–22.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.0–18.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.7%22.1–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults42.0%37.4–46.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.7%15.1–20.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.4–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.8–15.7
Any disability among adults28.8%25.2–32.8
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.4–7.0
Independent living disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.6
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.5–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.3–4.6
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.2%19.9–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.7–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.1%10.4–16.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%9.9–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.4–8.9
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.8–35.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.2–8.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–643.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)4.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)6.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle1.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription90.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)14.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households49.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age38.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$79,821$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$228,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$950$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth83.2 yr ± 2.0078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.00 years of 83.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured