Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13692

in Thousand Island Park, New YorkPopulation 222

65.47/ 100

Ranked #1,821 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.7%)

Ranked #255 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 14.8%)

Ranked #1 of 36 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY ZIPs (top 2.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

23%

in the bottom 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$190,250

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

3.3%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

4.3%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

2.7%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

82%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

5.1%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

4.6%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

260 intersections/sq mi

in the top 1.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

The read

Thousand Island Park, New York (ZIP 13692), by its composite score, sits in the top 5.7% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,821st) and the top 14.8% of New York (255th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 0.03% nationally, and household income resides in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled transportation is in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the bottom 0.2% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff stands in the bottom 0.2% nationally, colon screening registers in the top 0.06% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Modeled disaster risk sits in the bottom 0.6% nationally, modeled pfas lies in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and walkability rests in the top 1.1% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among the ZIPs nearby, none ranks healthier overall than this one.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 94%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.03%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 96%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 0.2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.05%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.07%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 99%

11%

Mental Health

in the top 1.0%

8%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 4%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults42.2%38.0–46.5
High blood pressure among adults47.1%42.7–51.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults18.3%16.2–20.1
Current asthma among adults9.5%8.4–10.7
Coronary heart disease among adults11.0%9.1–13.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%6.0–10.3
Depression among adults14.7%12.6–17.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%12.4–17.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened47.6%43.5–51.7
Obesity among adults33.1%28.0–38.7
Stroke among adults4.7%3.8–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.2%5.9–8.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years3.3%2.3–4.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.7%85.2–89.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults90.0%88.3–91.6
Cholesterol screening among adults96.1%95.4–96.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years82.0%78.8–85.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.7%69.9–75.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.4%74.8–85.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.4%9.5–13.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.8%5.5–10.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.8%17.1–27.2
Short sleep duration among adults33.1%29.0–37.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.2%11.1–17.8
Frequent mental distress among adults9.3%7.8–10.9
Frequent physical distress among adults12.6%10.3–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults7.1%5.7–8.6
Any disability among adults28.3%23.3–33.6
Hearing disability among adults10.2%8.5–11.9
Independent living disability among adults5.6%4.4–6.8
Mobility disability among adults15.0%11.8–18.6
Self-care disability among adults3.1%2.4–3.9
Vision disability among adults3.7%2.9–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults16.3%13.1–19.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.1%3.5–7.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.1–6.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults4.3%3.2–5.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults3.3%2.6–4.1
Loneliness among adults23.0%19.2–27.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults2.7%2.1–3.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)65.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)11.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate92.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households86.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+43.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age60.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$190,250$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$376,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth87.7 yr ± 1.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.87 years of 87.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured