ZIP code
13641
in Fishers Landing, New YorkPopulation 91
61.95/ 100
Ranked #3,548 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 11.1%)
Ranked #460 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 27%)
Ranked #3 of 36 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY ZIPs (top 8.4%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Loneliness
23.1%
in the bottom 0.04% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
3.5%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
88.6%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
5.0%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
5.5%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
3.4%
in the bottom 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
7.6%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›The read
Fishers Landing, New York (ZIP 13641), by its overall standing, sits in the top 11.1% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,548th) and the top 27% of New York (460th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled loneliness sits in the bottom 0.04% nationally, transportation settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, food insecurity lands in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and utility shutoff is in the bottom 1.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability resides in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and poverty rests at the national minimum. Homeownership lies at the national maximum. By contrast, modeled pfas sits in the top 0.6% nationally.
Defined in plain terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 13692, about 0.7 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 77%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 76%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.2%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 88%
11%
Mental Health
in the top 0.4%
8%
Disability
healthier than 80%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 90%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 18%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 5%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 72%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 80%
14%
Preventive Care
in the top 0.4%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 90%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 98%
8%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 80%
5%
About typical
Disability
healthier than 54%
7%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 5%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
13607
New Yorkshares a border
Score 55.41
Closest healthier
13692
New Yorkabout 0.7 mi away
Score 65.47
Similar health profile
22646
Virginia98% similar profile
Score 58.05
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 40.1% | 35.9–44.4 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 44.3% | 39.9–48.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 16.4% | 14.9–18.3 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.9% | 8.7–11.2 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.6% | 8.1–11.4 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.7% | 5.9–9.9 |
| Depression among adults | 15.4% | 13.0–18.0 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 13.8% | 11.6–16.5 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.4% | 41.2–49.7 |
| Obesity among adults | 34.7% | 29.5–40.3 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.3% | 3.6–5.2 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 10.4% | 8.5–12.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 2.8% | 1.8–4.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 85.4% | 82.6–88.1 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 88.6% | 86.6–90.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 96.1% | 95.2–96.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 75.8% | 72.3–79.3 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 72.1% | 69.3–74.9 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 79.7% | 73.9–84.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.5% | 11.4–15.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.2% | 6.4–12.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 21.9% | 17.4–27.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.7% | 31.4–40.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 14.4% | 11.4–18.0 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 10.1% | 8.5–12.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.0% | 10.8–15.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 7.6% | 6.1–9.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 27.4% | 22.9–32.7 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.1% | 7.8–10.7 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 5.8% | 4.6–7.2 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 14.8% | 11.8–18.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.4% | 2.6–4.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.7% | 3.0–4.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 17.0% | 13.8–20.5 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 5.5% | 3.8–7.4 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 4.9% | 3.2–6.8 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 5.0% | 3.6–6.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 3.5% | 2.7–4.4 |
| Loneliness among adults | 23.1% | 19.3–27.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 3.4% | 2.5–4.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 52.7% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 25.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 67.9% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 7.1% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 89.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 82.4% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 67.7 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | $61,458 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | $337,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 87.7 yr ± 1.87 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.87 years of 87.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured