Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13685

in Sackets Harbor, New YorkPopulation 2,362

61.23/ 100

Ranked #3,989 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.5%)

Ranked #517 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #4 of 36 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY ZIPs (top 11.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fatal road crashes

0 per 100,000 residents per year

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.8%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.17%

in the bottom 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

13.8%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST18th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Sackets Harbor, New York (ZIP 13685) places in the top 12.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,989th) and the top 30% of New York (517th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: fatal road crashes resides at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Modeled transportation noise lands in the bottom 9.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled fair or poor health registers in the bottom 8.7% nationally, cognitive disability settles in the bottom 11.4% nationally, and hearing disability sits in the bottom 13.2% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled binge drinking lies in the top 7.0% nationally. Fiber broadband rests at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled pfas resides in the top 12.1% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 13602, about 12 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 92%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

Disability

healthier than 69%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 96%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.5–30.0
High blood pressure among adults30.9%27.8–34.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.0%5.1–7.1
Depression among adults20.0%17.3–22.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.6%8.3–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%30.8–37.7
Obesity among adults35.3%30.5–40.4
Stroke among adults2.9%2.6–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.9%7.3–10.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.6%3.7–5.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.7%73.9–79.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.4%78.6–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.3–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%67.9–75.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.5–72.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%72.2–83.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.8%16.9–22.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.0–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.1%17.8–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%34.4–43.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults13.8%11.8–15.9
Frequent mental distress among adults15.3%13.5–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%10.2–13.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.2%9.7–12.9
Any disability among adults25.0%21.7–28.4
Hearing disability among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Independent living disability among adults6.6%5.7–7.5
Mobility disability among adults10.9%9.4–12.7
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.5–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.6–23.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.6–11.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%6.9–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.4–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Loneliness among adults29.5%25.6–34.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)42.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription91.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate59.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population2.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households68.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+26.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$79,469$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$283,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,333$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.0 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 82.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured