Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13602

in Fort Drum, New YorkPopulation 2,440

64.11/ 100

Ranked #2,392 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.5%)

Ranked #323 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #2 of 36 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY ZIPs (top 5.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

12.5%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

30%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

11.2%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

1.7%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

0.90%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.50%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

2.3%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.1%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

95.4%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

1.1%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Fort Drum, New York (ZIP 13602), by its composite score, sits in the top 7.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,392nd) and the top 19% of New York (323rd), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the bottom 0.3% nationally, mobility disability sits in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and hearing disability lies in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled binge drinking resides in the top 0.08% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 0.6% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 13692, about 18 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.4%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 99%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 32%

11%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.8%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

Disability

healthier than 96%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 43%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 26%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults3.8%3.2–4.5
High blood pressure among adults11.2%9.4–13.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults0.8%0.7–0.9
Current asthma among adults8.8%7.8–10.0
Coronary heart disease among adults0.9%0.8–1.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.4%1.1–1.7
Depression among adults17.0%14.5–19.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults1.7%1.4–2.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened12.5%10.7–14.5
Obesity among adults27.7%23.1–32.5
Stroke among adults0.5%0.4–0.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.4–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.4%6.7–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure20.8%17.6–24.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults69.4%65.2–73.5
Cholesterol screening among adults69.9%66.0–74.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years54.7%50.0–59.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.9%53.5–60.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.7%69.0–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults30.0%25.8–34.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults6.6%4.9–8.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.3%13.0–19.8
Short sleep duration among adults42.6%38.0–47.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.6%8.5–12.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%16.0–21.7
Frequent physical distress among adults6.5%5.4–7.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.6%12.7–18.0
Any disability among adults22.8%18.5–26.7
Hearing disability among adults2.1%1.8–2.4
Independent living disability among adults6.1%5.0–7.1
Mobility disability among adults2.3%1.9–2.8
Self-care disability among adults1.1%0.9–1.3
Vision disability among adults3.1%2.6–3.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.9%24.2–33.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%11.8–18.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.4–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.3–15.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.9–12.8
Loneliness among adults40.8%35.4–46.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.4–7.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population9.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age22.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth84.0 yr ± 1.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.52 years of 84.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured