Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13622

in Chaumont, New YorkPopulation 1,859

58.61/ 100

Ranked #5,889 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #731 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #7 of 36 Watertown-Fort Drum, NY ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Elder-services access

0.46 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.3%

in the bottom 9.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

55.9%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.9%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST81st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.5%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

21.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

Chaumont, New York (ZIP 13622), overall, ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,889th) and the top 42% of New York (731st), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: elder services settles in the top 2.7% nationally, modeled loneliness is in the bottom 9.0% nationally, and modeled colon screening sits in the top 7.6% nationally. Recreation lands in the top 10.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled cognitive disability stands in the bottom 10.2% nationally, and homeownership rests in the top 12.2% nationally. Childcare registers in the top 12.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled pfas resides in the top 9.9% nationally, and walkability settles in the bottom 12.9% nationally.

Defined simply, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 13693, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 95%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.8%28.7–35.0
High blood pressure among adults35.4%31.9–39.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.1%10.1–12.1
Current asthma among adults11.1%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.2–8.2
Depression among adults19.5%16.8–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.3%9.8–13.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%34.0–41.3
Obesity among adults36.7%31.7–42.2
Stroke among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.8%6.4–9.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.5%3.7–5.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%76.8–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.7–85.7
Cholesterol screening among adults91.0%89.8–92.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.9%69.1–76.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.4%64.4–70.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.2%72.2–83.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.4–20.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.2–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.2%19.6–27.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.7%34.3–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.3%13.1–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%13.0–16.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.6–12.6
Any disability among adults27.1%23.6–30.8
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–8.0
Mobility disability among adults13.1%11.3–15.1
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.5–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.4%7.8–11.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.3–10.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.4–10.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.6
Loneliness among adults28.3%24.3–32.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–642.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)32.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)5.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription92.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate92.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households59.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+28.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age47.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$81,065$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$234,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$907$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth86.0 yr ± 1.6378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.63 years of 86.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured