Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74358

in North Miami, OklahomaPopulation 222

22.57/ 100

Ranked #31,703 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.2%)

Ranked #630 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 0.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

37.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

15.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

510 intersections/sq mi

in the top 0.10% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

28.9%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.2%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.9%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.4%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.4%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.6%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

63.3%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, North Miami, Oklahoma (ZIP 74358) sits in the bottom 1.2% nationally (31,703rd) and the bottom 0.7% of Oklahoma (630th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: modeled tooth loss lands in the top 0.8% nationally, hearing disability resides in the top 0.3% nationally, and mobility disability lies in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 0.7% nationally, stroke stands in the top 1.4% nationally, and self-care disability is in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled vision disability rests in the top 2.8% nationally, and independent living disability sits in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 1.7% nationally. More positively, walkability lands in the top 0.10% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. ZIP 74339, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.1%33.6–40.7
High blood pressure among adults48.2%44.1–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.8–10.7
Current asthma among adults13.0%11.6–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults13.2%11.8–14.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.7%13.7–18.0
Depression among adults26.7%23.1–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults20.2%17.8–22.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.0%39.7–48.5
Obesity among adults44.7%37.4–52.6
Stroke among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years37.5%32.7–43.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.1%12.2–18.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.9%78.4–83.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.2%75.7–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.3–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.7%51.1–62.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults42.0%38.5–45.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years63.3%54.0–72.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.6%9.5–14.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults26.7%23.0–30.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults44.1%38.4–50.1
Short sleep duration among adults41.2%34.4–48.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.5%29.4–38.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%17.9–22.6
Frequent physical distress among adults21.5%19.0–24.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.0%20.3–26.0
Any disability among adults51.5%46.4–56.8
Hearing disability among adults15.7%14.2–17.4
Independent living disability among adults15.6%13.7–17.8
Mobility disability among adults28.9%25.5–32.6
Self-care disability among adults8.4%7.3–9.5
Vision disability among adults11.4%10.1–12.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.9%22.9–31.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.6%25.3–34.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.0%24.7–33.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.1%16.2–22.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.0%13.0–17.3
Loneliness among adults33.0%27.6–38.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.6–18.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6423.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)23.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)5.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)1.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle4.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription75.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)10.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate80.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households48.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$50,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$59,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$850$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.1478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.14 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured