Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

74766

in Wright City, OklahomaPopulation 1,100

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

29.18/ 100

Ranked #30,914 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.6%)

Ranked #598 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 5.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mammography

64.8%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST15th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.6%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

25.1%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.7%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.83 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.4%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

13.5%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25.5%

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

45.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.2%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Wright City, Oklahoma (ZIP 74766) lands in the bottom 3.6% nationally (30,914th) and the bottom 5.7% of Oklahoma (598th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled mammography settles in the bottom 2.7% nationally, and hearing disability lies in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 3.4% nationally, and independent living disability lands in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability registers in the top 5.1% nationally, unemployment sits in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled tooth loss rests in the top 6.7% nationally. Fatal road crashes is in the top 5.2% nationally, and modeled vision disability stands in the top 6.9% nationally. On the encouraging side, childcare settles in the top 3.5% nationally.

Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 74728, just across the boundary. Modeled independent living disability settles in the top 4.7% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 89%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 88.5; chronic-disease standing 5.2 (bottom 10%) — 83 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #352 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.8%31.3–38.5
High blood pressure among adults45.2%40.8–49.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.0%8.1–10.0
Current asthma among adults13.4%11.9–15.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.2–11.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.5%11.0–14.1
Depression among adults26.3%22.5–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.5%15.4–19.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%37.3–46.2
Obesity among adults43.4%35.4–51.5
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.5%21.4–30.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.6%10.6–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.2%76.5–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%75.8–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults83.3%81.1–85.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.4%51.0–62.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.5%43.7–51.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.8%55.8–73.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.2%9.9–14.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.9%20.8–27.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.3%33.8–44.9
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%32.2–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%26.0–33.2
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%18.0–22.7
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%17.0–21.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.4%19.1–23.8
Any disability among adults47.9%42.9–52.9
Hearing disability among adults12.6%11.3–14.0
Independent living disability among adults13.7%12.2–15.3
Mobility disability among adults25.1%22.2–28.1
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.2
Vision disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults27.4%23.4–31.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.9%23.4–30.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.4%20.9–27.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.8–20.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.2–15.4
Loneliness among adults34.9%29.5–40.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.4–16.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6434.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)16.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)7.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)13.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription84.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate80.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households44.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+15.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age38.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$48,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$93,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$733$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.8 yr ± 2.1178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.11 years of 72.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured