Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

74534

in Centrahoma, OklahomaPopulation 144

27.99/ 100

Ranked #31,102 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.1%)

Ranked #612 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 3.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mobility disability

25.6%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.7%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

67.1%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST42nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.8%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.9%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

32.6%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.7%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.6%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Centrahoma, Oklahoma (ZIP 74534) ranks in the bottom 3.1% nationally (31,102nd) and the bottom 3.5% of Oklahoma (612th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled mobility disability settles in the top 2.8% nationally, and hearing disability lies in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled independent living disability resides in the top 5.2% nationally, and self-care disability lands in the top 6.3% nationally. Modeled mammography registers in the bottom 5.7% nationally, coronary heart disease sits in the top 5.1% nationally, and cognitive disability rests in the top 6.3% nationally. Poverty is in the top 5.4% nationally, modeled stroke stands in the top 6.0% nationally, and modeled diabetes settles in the top 6.5% nationally.

For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 74538, just across the boundary. Modeled self-care disability settles in the top 6.3% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.1%34.1–42.2
High blood pressure among adults47.7%43.0–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Current asthma among adults13.6%12.0–15.3
Coronary heart disease among adults10.8%9.4–12.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.7%11.8–15.7
Depression among adults28.6%24.3–32.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.6%16.0–21.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.0%39.2–48.9
Obesity among adults44.1%35.3–53.1
Stroke among adults5.7%5.1–6.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.0%18.1–26.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.4%9.2–13.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.3–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%76.5–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.4%83.2–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.5%52.1–62.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.3%44.4–52.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years67.1%57.7–75.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.8%9.4–14.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.5%21.6–29.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.9%33.8–45.9
Short sleep duration among adults41.0%33.4–48.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.8%25.6–34.0
Frequent mental distress among adults20.2%17.8–22.7
Frequent physical distress among adults20.1%17.5–22.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.9%18.2–23.6
Any disability among adults47.8%42.2–53.2
Hearing disability among adults12.7%11.1–14.2
Independent living disability among adults13.5%11.7–15.3
Mobility disability among adults25.6%22.1–29.2
Self-care disability among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Vision disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%22.7–31.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.5%21.6–29.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.9%20.1–28.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.3–19.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.6%10.9–14.4
Loneliness among adults33.6%28.3–39.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.6%11.6–15.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–6422.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)12.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)6.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription89.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate75.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)7.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households49.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age50.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$38,750$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$100,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 0.8478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.84 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured