Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

73072

in Norman, OklahomaPopulation 50,881

53.77/ 100

Ranked #11,007 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 34%)

Ranked #35 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 5.6%)

Ranked #21 of 105 Oklahoma City, OK ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

10.8%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

1.8%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Dry extreme heat

60.5 days/year

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST50th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year with a modeled daily high of at least 95 °F.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

34.2%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

280 units

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.5%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.6%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.9%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 73072, one of several in Norman, Oklahoma sits in the top 34% healthiest ZIPs nationally (11,007th) and the top 5.6% of Oklahoma (35th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 8.8% nationally, modeled stroke stands in the bottom 6.7% nationally, and modeled diabetes is in the bottom 6.6% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 8.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled disaster risk sits in the top 1.6% nationally, and expected annual loss registers in the top 3.3% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure lands in the top 3.6% nationally, and slow internet speeds resides in the top 6.4% nationally. Modeled extreme heat lies in the top 7.3% nationally, and floodplain exposure settles in the top 8.2% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". ZIP 73170, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Oklahoma City, OK metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 87%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Disability

healthier than 94%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 7%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 67%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 53%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.8 ± 0.9 years. The 46 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.6 years — 3.2 years above them.

    Ranked #730 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults21.2%19.2–23.2
High blood pressure among adults30.1%27.3–32.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.3–7.6
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.6–5.8
Depression among adults26.5%23.4–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.3–37.1
Obesity among adults33.4%29.0–37.7
Stroke among adults2.5%2.3–2.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.1%7.5–11.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.2%7.1–9.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.2%68.9–73.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.5%73.3–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults81.2%79.1–83.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.1%62.1–70.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.1%58.9–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%67.7–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%12.1–16.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.6%9.2–12.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.3%20.3–26.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%29.5–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.6%13.8–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.5–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults11.0%9.7–12.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.5%14.8–18.3
Any disability among adults34.2%30.7–37.5
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–7.9
Independent living disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.1
Mobility disability among adults11.0%9.7–12.3
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.5–2.9
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.5%19.4–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.3–16.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.6–11.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.1–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.5–9.6
Loneliness among adults34.2%29.9–38.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.8–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28619.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643
No HS diploma (25+)4.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644
Bachelor's or higher (25+)54.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643
Broadband subscription92.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)29.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643
Homeownership rate55.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643
Foreign-born population6.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645
Single-parent households52.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640
Population 65+16.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645
Median age30.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642
Median household income$78,546$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616
Median home value$306,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615
Median gross rent$1,144$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$839 ($628–$1,136) n=546
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OK median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.8 yr ± 0.4878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.48 years of 78.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured