ZIP code
73145
in Oklahoma City, OklahomaPopulation 3,612
54.79/ 100
Ranked #9,714 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 30%)
Ranked #26 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (top 4.2%)
Ranked #18 of 105 Oklahoma City, OK ZIPs (top 17%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
19.2%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
16.7%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
1.7%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
3.4%
in the bottom 0.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.90%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
22.7%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
59.3%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
2.0%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
85.2%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
5.2%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, ZIP 73145, one of several in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma lands in the top 30% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,714th) and the top 4.2% of Oklahoma (26th).
The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: modeled high cholesterol sits in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and diabetes resides in the bottom 0.9% nationally. Modeled stroke registers in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Set against that, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 1.3% nationally, slow internet speeds lies in the top 0.8% nationally, and homeownership lands in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Modeled pfas sits in the top 1.0% nationally.
Set beside the nearby areas, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 73150, about 1.3 miles away, ranks better overall. The ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Oklahoma City, OK metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.8%
21%
Disability
healthier than 90%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 72%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 58%
11%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 30%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 30%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 9%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 10%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.5%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 60%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 86%
11%
Disability
in the top 0.3%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 78%
5%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 27%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 7%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 15%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.00%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 68%
11%
Disability
in the top 1.0%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 63%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 34%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 36%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 5%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 5%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 8%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Heavy environment, light chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 30.0; chronic-disease standing 99.3 (top 1%) — 69 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #16,335 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
73110
Oklahomashares a border
Score 42.03
Closest healthier
73150
Oklahomaabout 1.3 mi away
Score 54.91
Similar health profile
78234
Texas99% similar profile
Score 54.34
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 8.5% | 7.6–9.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 16.7% | 14.8–18.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 1.7% | 1.6–1.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.4% | 9.2–11.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 1.7% | 1.5–2.0 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 2.5% | 2.1–3.1 |
| Depression among adults | 26.6% | 23.6–29.8 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 3.4% | 3.0–3.9 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 19.2% | 17.2–21.4 |
| Obesity among adults | 28.6% | 25.0–32.4 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.9% | 0.8–1.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 11.0% | 8.5–13.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.5% | 8.7–15.2 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 42.5% | 39.3–45.7 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 68.2% | 64.2–71.7 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 70.5% | 65.4–75.1 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 55.4% | 50.3–60.4 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 63.9% | 60.3–67.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.3% | 66.0–79.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 22.7% | 19.7–26.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 9.3% | 7.2–11.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 19.3% | 15.7–23.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 33.4% | 29.1–37.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 12.5% | 10.1–15.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 20.9% | 17.6–24.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 8.0% | 6.7–9.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.4% | 15.7–23.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 31.2% | 26.1–36.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 3.4% | 2.9–3.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.3% | 5.8–9.0 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 5.2% | 4.4–6.2 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.6% | 1.4–1.9 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.5% | 2.9–4.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 27.8% | 23.1–32.8 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.2% | 11.8–19.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 9.5% | 7.3–12.1 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 12.8% | 10.3–15.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 10.0% | 8.0–12.2 |
| Loneliness among adults | 39.0% | 33.9–44.1 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.0% | 6.6–9.5 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 5.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 5.3% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 5.5% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 43.1% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 5.8% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 99.4% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 58.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 2.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.5% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 22.2% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 21.1 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $64,856 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $1,732 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 76.4 yr ± 1.37 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.37 years of 76.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured