Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84311

in Fielding, UtahPopulation 1,013

52.89/ 100

Ranked #12,238 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranked #181 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

9.8%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

19.1%

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

13 mi

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

97.1%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

36.6%

in the top 14.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Fielding, Utah (ZIP 84311) lands in the top 38% healthiest ZIPs nationally (12,238th) and the bottom 36% of Utah (181st).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 1.1% nationally, and home broadband subscription rests in the top 9.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise stands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled humid heat lies in the bottom 13.5% nationally, and high cholesterol lands in the bottom 10.2% nationally. On the other side, modeled tree cover sits at the national minimum, fine-particle is in the top 5.9% nationally, and arsenic settles in the top 6.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home resides in the top 7.0% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 84306, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 65%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.6–29.5
High blood pressure among adults31.9%28.4–35.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.8
Current asthma among adults11.6%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.6–7.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%5.8–7.9
Depression among adults27.4%23.8–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.5%9.1–12.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.2%29.5–37.2
Obesity among adults33.3%27.7–39.6
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.0%8.8–13.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.7%7.6–12.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.4%68.9–75.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.4%71.6–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults81.5%79.0–83.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.9%59.7–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.9%63.3–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.7%62.2–77.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.8%7.9–12.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.8%8.8–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.1%17.6–25.2
Short sleep duration among adults37.7%32.1–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.7–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.1–20.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.7%12.9–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.5–19.3
Any disability among adults32.1%28.2–36.7
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.3–9.7
Mobility disability among adults13.6%11.6–15.9
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.3–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.0–23.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.9–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.3–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.1–11.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.3
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.2–35.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.0%5.9–8.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6421.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)3.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)4.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription97.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)36.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate82.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households46.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+19.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$77,841$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$454,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$975$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.3078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.30 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured