Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

84324

in Mantua, UtahPopulation 1,677

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

61.48/ 100

Ranked #3,818 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.0%)

Ranked #53 of 284 Utah ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

13 ppb

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.4%

in the bottom 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST41st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

10 per million

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST24th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$142,188

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

2.1%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

97.2%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Park land

22.1%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

2.4%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST15th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.3%

in the bottom 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Mantua, Utah (ZIP 84324), in overall standing, comes out in the top 12.0% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,818th) and the top 19% of Utah (53rd).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 1.9% nationally, modeled air-toxics cancer risk resides in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and household income sits in the top 4.9% nationally. Homeownership stands in the top 6.3% nationally, park land resides in the top 6.3% nationally, and poverty sits in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the bottom 9.5% nationally, and transportation resides in the bottom 9.9% nationally. On the other hand, lead in tap water sits in the top 1.1% nationally, and modeled fine-particle stands in the top 4.4% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 84310, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 45%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 68%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.9%21.9–28.2
High blood pressure among adults29.9%26.2–33.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.2%8.3–10.2
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.6–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.2%4.2–6.4
Depression among adults25.2%21.8–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.0%7.6–10.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.9%29.1–37.1
Obesity among adults30.6%25.0–36.9
Stroke among adults2.8%2.4–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.1–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.4%5.5–9.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure72.0%68.0–75.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.2%72.5–79.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.5%81.9–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.3%62.3–71.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.8%68.5–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%65.9–80.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.4%8.5–12.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults8.4%6.4–10.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.7%13.1–20.8
Short sleep duration among adults37.2%31.6–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults14.3%11.5–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.8%13.5–18.3
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%10.4–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.1–16.0
Any disability among adults26.7%22.5–31.5
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.1–7.6
Mobility disability among adults10.7%8.6–12.9
Self-care disability among adults2.7%2.2–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.5%2.9–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.8%15.7–22.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%6.6–11.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.2–6.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.3%5.6–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.2–6.3
Loneliness among adults29.8%25.3–34.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.0–6.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate2.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–643.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)3.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)41.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle0.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription96.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate97.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households43.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age30.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$142,188$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$607,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$2,000$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.9 yr ± 1.1678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.16 years of 79.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured