Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84337

in Tremonton, UtahPopulation 16,199

54.12/ 100

Ranked #10,532 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 33%)

Ranked #152 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 46%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

10.9%

in the bottom 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.4%

in the bottom 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

1.6%

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST74th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

20.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

19.9 per million

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST62nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

28.2%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST29th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.1%

in the bottom 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST34th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

48 µg/L

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

21.3 days/year

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US18th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Tremonton, Utah (ZIP 84337) places in the top 33% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,532nd) and the bottom 46% of Utah (152nd).

continue reading

The standout strengths in the data are the natural place to begin: modeled binge drinking resides in the bottom 2.9% nationally, and high cholesterol is in the bottom 3.9% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled air-toxics cancer risk stands in the bottom 7.9% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the bottom 6.5% nationally. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 9.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled fine-particle lies in the top 5.9% nationally, arsenic rests in the top 6.3% nationally, and tree cover resides in the bottom 12.7% nationally.

For readers new to these terms, fine-particle is fine airborne particles about one-thirtieth the width of a hair, counted on modeled days above the EPA standard. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 84302, less than a tenth of a mile away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 90%

11%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Disability

healthier than 41%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 28.9; chronic-disease standing 85.8 — 57 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,097 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults22.5%20.0–25.3
High blood pressure among adults28.2%25.0–31.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.0
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.7%5.0–6.5
Depression among adults27.3%23.8–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.4%26.9–34.2
Obesity among adults32.8%27.3–39.1
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.2%9.0–13.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.3%9.5–13.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.2%64.8–71.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.7%68.9–76.6
Cholesterol screening among adults78.5%76.0–81.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%58.5–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.2–70.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.0%62.6–78.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.9%8.9–13.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.5%8.8–12.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.4%16.9–24.1
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%32.3–43.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.4%15.1–20.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.8–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.4–19.5
Any disability among adults30.7%26.7–34.7
Hearing disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Independent living disability among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.1–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.4–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.9–16.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.4–9.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.2–12.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.7–8.7
Loneliness among adults33.3%28.9–37.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6416.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)8.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription93.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate73.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households42.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+9.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age31.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$81,683$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$392,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$1,222$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.7 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 81.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured