Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

84542

in Wellington, UtahPopulation 1,624

50.79/ 100

Ranked #15,157 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 47%)

Ranked #221 of 284 Utah ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loud transportation noise

3.7%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

5.4 days/year

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST33rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

82.5 mi

in the top 4.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST67th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

30.8%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST23rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

14.1 per million

in the bottom 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST52nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.7%

in the bottom 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

11.0%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

The read

Wellington, Utah (ZIP 84542), by its composite score, sits in the top 47% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,157th) and the bottom 22% of Utah (221st).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled humid heat lands in the bottom 3.4% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site stands in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol registers in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and air-toxics cancer risk settles in the bottom 6.0% nationally. Modeled binge drinking sits in the bottom 5.3% nationally, and expected annual loss lies in the bottom 10.7% nationally. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Pulling the other way, modeled loud transportation noise resides in the top 2.5% nationally, transportation noise is in the top 7.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 10.3% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Air-toxics cancer risk is a modeled EPA estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air, per million people. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 84521, about 3.0 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Disability

healthier than 45%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 42%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 40%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 34%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.3%25.4–31.2
High blood pressure among adults30.9%27.6–34.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.0–7.8
Depression among adults29.3%25.6–33.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.2%9.7–12.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened30.8%27.1–34.2
Obesity among adults33.8%28.1–39.5
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.5%10.8–16.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%8.9–12.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.9%68.4–74.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults72.6%68.6–76.0
Cholesterol screening among adults79.8%77.3–82.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.5%57.8–67.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.3%59.6–67.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.1%62.9–78.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.7%9.5–13.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.2%9.3–13.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.0%16.9–23.5
Short sleep duration among adults34.5%29.1–40.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%16.0–21.0
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.2–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.2–16.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.4–19.6
Any disability among adults34.3%30.3–38.4
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.5–9.4
Independent living disability among adults8.8%7.8–9.9
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.0–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.3
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.0%18.1–24.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.8%12.4–17.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.4%6.9–10.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.4–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.9–9.1
Loneliness among adults32.5%28.2–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3647.0% (1.0–21.5%) n=283
Uninsured 18–6414.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.1% (2.9–25.0%) n=281
No HS diploma (25+)9.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.4% (0.0–15.0%) n=284
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50528.5% (10.8–53.1%) n=284
Unemployment rate (16+)5.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.7%) n=281
Households without a vehicle4.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.7%) n=283
Broadband subscription80.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32293.3% (78.4–98.3%) n=283
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.1% (7.6–35.3%) n=283
Homeownership rate62.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.5% (52.0–96.8%) n=283
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3222.0% (0.0–7.6%) n=283
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.2% (0.0–11.8%) n=284
Single-parent households54.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08749.8% (37.3–72.7%) n=281
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55315.3% (7.9–29.1%) n=284
Median age33.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29235.9 yr (27.6–52.1) n=283
Median household income$61,466$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,344 ($52,938–$126,884) n=260
Median home value$179,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$402,500 ($229,220–$651,780) n=259
Median gross rent$888$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,321 ($834–$1,911) n=198
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)UT median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.3 yr ± 1.2478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.7 yr (77.0–85.3) n=277

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.24 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured