ZIP code
74574
in Tuskahoma, OklahomaPopulation 1,109
30.53/ 100
Ranked #30,653 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.5%)
Ranked #579 of 634 Oklahoma ZIPs (bottom 8.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Hearing disability
15.5%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
13.0%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
27.6%
in the top 1.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.5%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Distance to an emergency room
30.2 mi
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
51.4%
in the top 2.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
20.2%
in the top 3.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
10.9%
in the bottom 2.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
46.2%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
26.2%
in the top 5.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST93rdUS94thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›The read
In overall standing, Tuskahoma, Oklahoma (ZIP 74574) comes out in the bottom 4.5% nationally (30,653rd) and the bottom 8.7% of Oklahoma (579th), based on limited data; treat as directional.
The profile opens on the burdens that define it most: modeled hearing disability registers in the top 0.3% nationally, coronary heart disease stands in the top 0.8% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the top 1.3% nationally. Modeled stroke is in the top 2.3% nationally, distance to an emergency room resides in the top 1.9% nationally, and modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 2.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 3.5% nationally, and high cholesterol sits in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 5.9% nationally. More positively, modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 2.9% nationally.
The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 74521, just across the boundary. Modeled stroke registers in the top 2.3% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 78%
14%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 1%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 29%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 16%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Disability
healthier than 2%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 14%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 34%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 91%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 68%
13%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 56%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
in the bottom 0.7%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 9%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 27%
11%
Disability
healthier than 4%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 31%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 39%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
74521
Oklahomashares a border
Score 30.62
Closest healthier
74536
Oklahomashares a border
Score 30.57
Similar health profile
73062
Oklahoma99% similar profile
Score 39.80
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 39.9% | 37.0–43.0 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 51.4% | 48.1–54.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 11.1% | 10.2–12.0 |
| Current asthma among adults | 12.4% | 11.4–13.7 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 13.0% | 11.9–14.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 13.9% | 12.5–15.4 |
| Depression among adults | 25.3% | 22.6–28.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 20.2% | 18.4–22.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 46.2% | 42.8–50.0 |
| Obesity among adults | 41.2% | 35.5–47.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.5% | 6.0–7.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 26.2% | 22.6–29.9 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.1% | 9.5–13.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.6% | 80.7–84.6 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.5% | 79.1–83.9 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.2% | 85.8–88.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 60.2% | 55.7–64.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 50.9% | 47.7–54.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 67.9% | 60.9–74.3 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 10.9% | 9.4–12.7 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 23.6% | 21.1–26.4 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 39.8% | 35.7–44.3 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 36.8% | 31.7–42.3 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 29.6% | 26.8–32.7 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 18.0% | 16.4–19.7 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 19.9% | 18.2–21.9 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 19.2% | 17.4–21.2 |
| Any disability among adults | 49.4% | 45.6–53.4 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 15.5% | 14.3–16.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 13.0% | 11.8–14.4 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 27.6% | 25.2–30.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.0% | 6.3–7.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 9.3% | 8.5–10.2 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.5% | 22.5–28.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 23.4% | 20.7–26.3 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 21.7% | 18.9–24.5 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.5% | 13.6–17.3 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.8% | 10.6–13.1 |
| Loneliness among adults | 32.0% | 28.0–36.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 12.6% | 11.2–14.1 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 24.7% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 16.3% (6.5–26.1%) n=643 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 25.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 19.4% (9.5–30.7%) n=643 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 8.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 10.9% (4.8–18.9%) n=644 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 15.9% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.4% (9.0–38.4%) n=644 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 3.3% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.3% (0.4–8.8%) n=643 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.5% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–9.0%) n=643 |
| Broadband subscription | 70.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 85.4% (70.2–95.0%) n=643 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 15.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 20.0% (9.5–31.0%) n=643 |
| Homeownership rate | 85.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.2% (56.5–91.0%) n=643 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.5% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 2.3% (0.0–6.1%) n=643 |
| Foreign-born population | 2.4% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.9% (0.0–9.3%) n=645 |
| Single-parent households | 52.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 51.7% (39.5–66.1%) n=640 |
| Population 65+ | 25.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 18.4% (11.9–29.5%) n=645 |
| Median age | 47.0 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 40.3 yr (33.1–52.0) n=642 |
| Median household income | $39,896 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $58,728 ($43,042–$88,542) n=616 |
| Median home value | $134,500 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $142,200 ($83,960–$248,900) n=615 |
| Median gross rent | $625 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $839 ($628–$1,136) n=546 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | OK median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.0 yr ± 1.67 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 77.2 yr (73.6–81.3) n=638 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.67 years of 81.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured