Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36748

in Linden, AlabamaPopulation 2,522

31.02/ 100

Ranked #30,548 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.8%)

Ranked #573 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 7.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

22.7%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

55.3%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

8.3%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.7%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

27.4%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.0%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.4%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

25.9 mi

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.6%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By its overall health score, Linden, Alabama (ZIP 36748) lands in the bottom 4.8% nationally (30,548th) and the bottom 7.5% of Alabama (573rd).

continue reading

The measures that define the ground here come first: modeled diabetes rests in the top 1.3% nationally, and high blood pressure is in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and stroke settles in the top 1.8% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lies in the top 1.4% nationally, independent living disability resides in the top 2.6% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and distance to an emergency room sits in the top 2.8% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 2.2% nationally.

Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 36732, just across the boundary. On a broader view, the area also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 32%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 39%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 92.5 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 1.8 (bottom 10%) — 91 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #101 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.6%34.9–42.5
High blood pressure among adults55.3%51.0–59.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.0–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.8%11.4–14.3
Depression among adults23.4%19.9–27.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.7%20.1–25.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.3%41.8–50.9
Obesity among adults45.3%37.2–53.7
Stroke among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.3%22.0–30.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.6%10.6–14.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.1%79.7–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.3%80.3–86.2
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.6–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.2%58.8–69.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.3%42.3–50.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.3%65.2–80.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.6%8.6–13.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.1%18.3–23.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.6%34.3–45.0
Short sleep duration among adults43.4%36.3–50.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.2%30.5–37.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.0%16.9–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults19.0%16.9–21.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.1%17.8–22.3
Any disability among adults47.4%42.4–52.2
Hearing disability among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Independent living disability among adults15.0%13.5–16.6
Mobility disability among adults27.4%24.5–30.3
Self-care disability among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Vision disability among adults10.4%9.5–11.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.8%24.9–33.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.7%29.2–36.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults29.5%26.4–32.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.6%19.1–24.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.7%13.9–17.4
Loneliness among adults37.7%32.3–43.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.9%14.9–19.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6417.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)17.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)12.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle18.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription74.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate68.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population1.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households64.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+19.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age46.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$42,826$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$93,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$764$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 0.5078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.50 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured