Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

71961

in Oden, ArkansasPopulation 1,120

35.48/ 100

Ranked #29,199 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.0%)

Ranked #416 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

12.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

13.0%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

29%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Park land

59.2%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.0%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

50.2%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

46.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.3%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.8%

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Distance to the nearest emergency room
  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

By the composite measure, Oden, Arkansas (ZIP 71961) sits in the bottom 9.0% nationally (29,199th) and the bottom 26% of Arkansas (416th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The readings that carry the most weight locally lead the way: modeled coronary heart disease lies in the top 1.5% nationally, hearing disability settles in the top 2.0% nationally, and tooth loss stands in the top 3.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the top 3.3% nationally, high cholesterol rests in the top 1.9% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the top 4.4% nationally. Modeled stroke registers in the top 5.3% nationally. On the encouraging side, park land lands in the top 1.7% nationally, and modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 2.2% nationally. Modeled pfas lies in the bottom 6.5% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 71953, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. This ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 27%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 20%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Climate / Disaster RiskPartial

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.0%33.9–42.1
High blood pressure among adults50.2%45.4–54.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults11.8%10.6–13.0
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.2–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.4%11.2–15.7
Depression among adults25.2%21.5–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.1–20.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.6%41.9–51.5
Obesity among adults42.1%33.8–50.8
Stroke among adults5.8%5.1–6.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years29.0%24.5–34.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.5%8.2–13.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.5%79.8–84.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.5–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults87.1%85.1–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.0%60.9–71.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.6%48.9–56.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%61.1–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.4%10.1–15.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.2%15.8–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.9%30.9–43.2
Short sleep duration among adults38.1%31.4–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%25.2–34.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%15.7–20.5
Frequent physical distress among adults19.5%17.0–22.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.2–21.8
Any disability among adults45.3%39.8–51.2
Hearing disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.7
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.3–13.9
Mobility disability among adults24.3%20.9–28.2
Self-care disability among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Vision disability among adults7.8%6.7–8.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%20.4–28.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.1%14.7–21.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.2%9.7–15.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.0%10.0–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.3%7.9–10.8
Loneliness among adults32.0%26.9–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.0–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6416.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)10.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)13.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription76.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate76.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households46.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+30.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age47.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$37,054$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$124,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$625$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.0 yr ± 1.6978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.69 years of 77.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured