Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65803

in Springfield, MissouriPopulation 42,882

41.32/ 100

Ranked #25,799 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #625 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #38 of 52 Springfield, MO ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

670 units

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.8%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.1 ppb

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US90th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

11 µg/L

in the bottom 11.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

55%

in the bottom 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.14 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US87th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

77.8%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, ZIP 65803, one of several in Springfield, Missouri sits in the bottom 20% nationally (25,799th) and the bottom 37% of Missouri (625th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: distance to a Superfund site sits at the national minimum, modeled disaster risk stands in the top 4.0% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 6.6% nationally. Lead in tap water sits in the top 9.8% nationally, modeled expected annual loss stands in the top 10.2% nationally, and homeownership resides in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Better still, subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and transit stands in the top 6.2% nationally. Modeled arsenic resides in the bottom 11.1% nationally, and lithium in drinking water sits in the bottom 11.3% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put plainly, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 65617, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, MO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 37%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 12%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 39%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 7%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 36%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.3 ± 0.8 years. A median household income of $50,572 predicts 77.4 years — 2.1 years below.

    Ranked #2,750 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.3 ± 0.8 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.3 years — 3.0 years below them.

    Ranked #2,386 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.7%27.7–33.8
High blood pressure among adults36.5%32.9–40.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.6%6.9–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.0%9.1–11.1
Depression among adults25.5%22.3–29.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.4–14.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.8%33.2–40.7
Obesity among adults40.1%34.2–46.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.0%14.8–21.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.2%8.9–11.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.1–79.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.5%74.2–80.8
Cholesterol screening among adults81.8%79.8–83.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%55.1–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.0%50.4–57.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.8%61.7–76.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.9%12.5–17.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%17.5–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.5%26.6–34.9
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%34.3–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%21.7–26.9
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.8–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.8%18.8–22.8
Any disability among adults41.2%37.1–45.5
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.3–10.3
Independent living disability among adults11.4%10.3–12.6
Mobility disability among adults18.4%16.4–20.5
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.9–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.4–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.3%16.1–20.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.9%14.0–18.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.9–16.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Loneliness among adults32.8%28.4–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.2–13.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6418.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)5.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle7.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription87.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate55.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households52.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age36.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$50,572$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$173,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$919$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.3 yr ± 0.4078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.40 years of 75.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured