Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64850

in Neosho, MissouriPopulation 25,126

42.31/ 100

Ranked #24,967 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 22%)

Ranked #578 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #21 of 31 Joplin, MO-KS ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

276 units

in the top 8.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

19.9%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.5%

in the top 11.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Fine-particle (PM2.5) exceedance

0.61%

in the top 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The share of days in the year when modeled fine-particle (PM2.5) pollution was above the EPA’s daily limit of 35 micrograms per cubic meter.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Neosho, Missouri (ZIP 64850) stands in the bottom 22% nationally (24,967th) and the bottom 42% of Missouri (578th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 4.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room lands at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 8.9% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. On the other side, distance to a Superfund site settles at the national minimum, modeled disaster risk rests in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss lands in the top 8.3% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability settles in the top 9.8% nationally, and loud transportation noise rests in the top 11.8% nationally.

Set beside the wider area around it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For clarity, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. ZIP 64804, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Joplin, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 33%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 53%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 30%

8%

Disability

healthier than 23%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $63,469 predicts 78.3 years — 2.3 years below.

    Ranked #3,195 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.9%27.5–34.4
High blood pressure among adults37.8%33.5–42.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.7%7.9–9.7
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.7–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.8%7.0–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.8–11.0
Depression among adults25.8%21.9–29.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.4%11.7–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.2%33.6–42.8
Obesity among adults39.7%31.3–48.4
Stroke among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.2%14.2–20.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%9.5–12.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.2–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.7%73.9–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults82.0%79.9–84.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%56.3–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.5%52.7–60.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.4%63.2–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.1%12.2–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.0%16.6–21.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.6%27.8–38.0
Short sleep duration among adults38.6%31.9–45.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.9%21.1–27.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.0–21.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.3%14.5–18.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.9%17.8–22.1
Any disability among adults39.5%34.8–44.4
Hearing disability among adults9.6%8.6–10.7
Independent living disability among adults11.0%9.9–12.2
Mobility disability among adults18.3%16.2–20.7
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.3–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.7–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.4–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.8–19.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.0–15.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%12.1–15.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.1%9.0–11.3
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.1–36.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.3%9.1–11.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6422.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)11.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle4.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription86.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate70.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population6.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households55.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+15.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age36.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$63,469$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$171,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$774$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.9 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 75.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured