Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

64624

in Braymer, MissouriPopulation 1,489

41.35/ 100

Ranked #25,784 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 20%)

Ranked #624 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (bottom 37%)

Ranked #172 of 200 Kansas City, MO-KS ZIPs (bottom 14.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Hearing disability

11.4%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Braymer, Missouri (ZIP 64624), overall, ranks in the bottom 20% nationally (25,784th) and the bottom 37% of Missouri (624th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, modeled hearing disability rests in the top 7.0% nationally, and home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 10.1% nationally. Slow internet speeds resides in the top 11.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room settles in the top 13.4% nationally. Modeled mobility disability is in the top 13.9% nationally, and cognitive disability sits in the top 14.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled coronary heart disease lies in the top 15% nationally.

Defined simply, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Distance to a community health center is a federally funded (HRSA) community health center serving everyone regardless of ability to pay. ZIP 64085, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Kansas City, MO-KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 68%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 29%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 98%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 16%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 69.3; chronic-disease standing 15.6 — 54 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,198 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.4%32.3–38.7
High blood pressure among adults42.4%38.7–46.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%10.0–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Depression among adults25.0%21.9–28.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.6%12.9–16.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%38.2–46.0
Obesity among adults39.6%32.8–47.1
Stroke among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.9%16.0–22.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.6–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.8–83.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.9–82.6
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.1–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.3%61.0–69.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.6%52.1–59.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.8%63.6–77.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%12.2–17.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.6%17.1–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%31.0–40.5
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%32.1–44.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.9%22.1–28.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%16.2–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults17.4%15.6–19.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.9%16.9–21.0
Any disability among adults42.4%38.4–46.9
Hearing disability among adults11.4%10.4–12.6
Independent living disability among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Mobility disability among adults20.8%18.5–23.3
Self-care disability among adults5.0%4.5–5.5
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.7%16.8–22.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.3–17.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.3–14.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.4%9.7–13.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Loneliness among adults31.3%26.9–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.5–9.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6414.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)8.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)14.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle5.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription75.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate82.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households60.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+28.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age50.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$58,095$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$95,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$725$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured