Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

51111

in Sioux City, IowaPopulation 39

35.47/ 100

Ranked #29,203 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.0%)

Ranked #919 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (bottom 0.4%)

Ranked #29 of 30 Sioux City, IA-NE-SD ZIPs (bottom 3.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Homeownership rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Lithium in drinking water

180 µg/L

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.5 pCi/L

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST54th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

21.9%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.7%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 51111, one of several in Sioux City, Iowa, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 9.0% nationally (29,203rd) and the bottom 0.4% of Iowa (919th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: homeownership stands at the national minimum, lithium in drinking water resides in the top 0.7% nationally, and PFOA in drinking water sits at the national maximum. PFOS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, modeled radon resides in the top 4.8% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled independent living disability stands in the top 4.7% nationally. Better still, housing-cost burden resides at the national minimum, and poverty sits at the national minimum. Home broadband subscription stands at the national maximum.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 51054, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Sioux City, IA-NE-SD metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 30%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 22%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.4%

8%

Disability

in the bottom 0.3%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.00%

8%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.8%25.2–30.6
High blood pressure among adults36.4%33.3–39.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.6–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.2%7.0–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.0%9.6–14.5
Depression among adults23.7%20.6–27.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.7%12.6–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%32.2–38.5
Obesity among adults41.1%36.3–45.9
Stroke among adults4.6%3.9–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.1%17.2–25.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.0%12.2–20.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.9–78.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.9%72.6–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults74.7%71.3–77.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%56.1–64.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.2%46.9–53.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.3%64.3–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.5–19.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.1%17.2–25.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.0%33.5–44.9
Short sleep duration among adults33.7%29.9–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults30.3%25.4–35.6
Frequent mental distress among adults22.1%19.4–24.8
Frequent physical distress among adults18.4%15.8–21.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.9%18.5–25.5
Any disability among adults40.1%34.9–45.7
Hearing disability among adults9.2%8.0–10.5
Independent living disability among adults13.7%11.4–16.2
Mobility disability among adults19.7%16.4–23.1
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.0–7.4
Vision disability among adults9.0%7.5–10.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults28.2%24.4–32.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.1%23.0–33.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults27.7%22.4–33.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.8%14.9–20.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.6–17.6
Loneliness among adults38.3%33.6–43.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.4%10.5–14.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–6469.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription100.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate0.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age26.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.7 yr ± 2.2378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.23 years of 72.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured