Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65631

in Clever, MissouriPopulation 6,174

50.26/ 100

Ranked #15,886 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 50%)

Ranked #186 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #13 of 52 Springfield, MO ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Diabetes

10.0%

in the bottom 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US16th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

3.0%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.8%

in the bottom 20% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US20th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

34.8%

in the bottom 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US18th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

33.1%

in the bottom 24% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US24th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Clever, Missouri (ZIP 65631) lands in the top 50% healthiest ZIPs nationally (15,886th) and the top 19% of Missouri (186th).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 11.9% nationally, diabetes registers in the bottom 16% nationally, and stroke resides in the bottom 18% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 20% nationally, poverty is in the bottom 21% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits in the top 22% nationally. On the other side, modeled short sleep lands in the top 16% nationally. Physicians lies at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 19% nationally, and modeled binge drinking rests in the top 19% nationally.

Put simply, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. On the overall standing, ZIP 65714, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, MO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 63%

14%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 56%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 27%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 89%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 70%

16%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 28%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 41%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 32%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%24.5–30.3
High blood pressure among adults33.1%29.6–36.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.3–8.8
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.2–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.2
Depression among adults26.1%22.8–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.0%8.8–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.8%31.0–38.4
Obesity among adults37.4%30.6–44.6
Stroke among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.2%10.1–14.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.2–9.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.7%72.1–77.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.9%73.3–80.0
Cholesterol screening among adults83.9%81.7–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.2%57.5–66.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.3%54.9–61.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%66.0–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.0%15.1–21.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%14.0–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.6%22.6–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%34.2–46.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.5%16.2–21.2
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.3–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.3–19.6
Any disability among adults34.6%30.4–39.2
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.4%7.4–9.5
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.3%16.5–22.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.4–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.0–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.1–12.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.4
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.2–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.7–8.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–649.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)1.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate78.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households38.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+9.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age35.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$86,875$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$247,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,128$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.5 yr ± 1.2778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.27 years of 79.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured