Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

37042

in Clarksville, TennesseePopulation 87,652

46.09/ 100

Ranked #21,249 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 34%)

Ranked #167 of 616 Tennessee ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #10 of 23 Clarksville, TN-KY ZIPs (top 43%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Short sleep

47%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

4.5%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.7%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

3.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

5.2%

in the bottom 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

248 units

in the top 10.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.8%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 37042, one of several in Clarksville, Tennessee, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 34% nationally (21,249th) and the top 27% of Tennessee (167th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled short sleep sits in the top 1.4% nationally, expected annual loss stands in the top 0.9% nationally, and disaster risk resides in the top 6.3% nationally. Better still, fiber broadband sits in the top 2.1% nationally, modeled coronary heart disease stands in the bottom 5.7% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 5.9% nationally. Transit sits in the top 8.6% nationally, and modeled hearing disability stands in the bottom 8.1% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 10.0% nationally. Distance to a community health center sits at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs.

Set within its surrounding area, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 37142, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Clarksville, TN-KY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 93%

21%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 49%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 54%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 15%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.00%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults23.1%20.5–25.9
High blood pressure among adults33.5%29.9–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults4.5%4.1–5.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Depression among adults29.6%25.8–33.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.1%9.7–12.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.7%28.0–35.6
Obesity among adults40.3%33.6–47.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.1%14.0–20.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.3%11.7–15.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure68.0%65.0–71.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%71.9–79.3
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.1–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.5%55.3–65.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.9%52.1–59.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%66.2–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%13.7–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.1%14.9–19.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.8%21.9–29.9
Short sleep duration among adults47.0%40.4–53.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.1%18.6–23.6
Frequent mental distress among adults21.9%19.6–24.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.0–15.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%17.2–21.2
Any disability among adults33.9%29.9–38.1
Hearing disability among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Independent living disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Mobility disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.1–26.1%) n=609
Uninsured 18–6413.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.0% (5.9–24.0%) n=615
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.6% (4.2–19.5%) n=613
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.0% (10.0–42.6%) n=613
Unemployment rate (16+)6.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.0% (0.4–9.6%) n=613
Households without a vehicle3.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.3–10.1%) n=608
Broadband subscription93.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.7% (76.0–94.9%) n=608
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.4% (11.8–33.6%) n=608
Homeownership rate58.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.7% (53.4–91.5%) n=608
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.5% (0.0–4.5%) n=608
Foreign-born population8.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=617
Single-parent households43.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.6% (39.1–68.7%) n=608
Population 65+7.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.5–27.9%) n=617
Median age30.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.3 yr (33.8–52.5) n=615
Median household income$70,393$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,577 ($42,745–$94,822) n=594
Median home value$247,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,100 ($120,900–$397,120) n=593
Median gross rent$1,271$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$908 ($659–$1,523) n=516
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)TN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured