Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

63362

in Moscow Mills, MissouriPopulation 9,930

49.56/ 100

Ranked #16,865 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #208 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #130 of 234 St. Louis, MO-IL ZIPs (bottom 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

100 µg/L

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

19.4%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.1%

in the bottom 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

30.3%

in the bottom 12.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.8%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33.4%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.5%

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.3%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

3.2%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

6.7%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Moscow Mills, Missouri (ZIP 63362), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 47% nationally (16,865th) and the top 21% of Missouri (208th).

continue reading

A balanced showing across the data, with a few readings each side: modeled coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 10.9% nationally, high blood pressure sits in the bottom 12.1% nationally, and stroke stands in the bottom 12.5% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 11.0% nationally, and diabetes sits in the bottom 12.2% nationally. On the other hand, lithium in drinking water stands in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled binge drinking resides in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability sits in the top 17% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands in the top 18% nationally. Physicians resides at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 63348, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the St. Louis, MO-IL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 78%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 73%

16%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 24%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Disability

healthier than 86%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 50%

16%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $88,977 predicts 79.6 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,768 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.9 ± 1.1 years. The 50 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 79.4 years — 2.6 years below them.

    Ranked #1,996 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.1%21.1–27.0
High blood pressure among adults30.3%26.6–34.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults5.1%4.6–5.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.8%6.0–7.7
Depression among adults25.9%22.1–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.5%8.1–10.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.4%29.4–37.4
Obesity among adults39.1%31.4–46.8
Stroke among adults2.8%2.5–3.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.7%11.2–16.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.8%7.4–10.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.3%67.9–74.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.2%71.0–78.9
Cholesterol screening among adults81.5%79.2–83.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years62.7%57.6–67.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults58.8%55.1–62.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%67.5–81.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults19.4%15.9–23.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.9%14.6–19.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults26.8%22.5–31.4
Short sleep duration among adults39.6%33.3–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%16.0–21.1
Frequent mental distress among adults19.4%17.2–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%11.9–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.5%16.5–20.8
Any disability among adults34.8%30.3–39.5
Hearing disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.5
Independent living disability among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.2–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.2%17.3–23.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.4–14.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.1–13.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%7.0–9.0
Loneliness among adults32.9%28.2–37.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.0–9.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–6413.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)10.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle2.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)17.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate80.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population0.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households49.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+10.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age32.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$88,977$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$235,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$1,066$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 0.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.54 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured