Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

65336

in Knob Noster, MissouriPopulation 6,519

49.51/ 100

Ranked #16,929 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #211 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.65 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

8.9%

in the top 12.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

30.4%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

33.3%

in the bottom 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

5.4%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.9%

in the bottom 15.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

9.9%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.3%

in the top 16% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

12.8%

in the bottom 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US26th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Knob Noster, Missouri (ZIP 65336) lands in the bottom 47% nationally (16,929th) and the top 21% of Missouri (211th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: mental-health providers stands in the top 5.9% nationally, and childcare lies in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled pfas lands in the bottom 10.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the bottom 12.5% nationally, high cholesterol settles in the bottom 10.6% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the bottom 14.6% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers in the bottom 17% nationally. Set against that, unemployment rests in the top 12.4% nationally, and modeled cognitive disability stands in the top 13.0% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 65305, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 80%

21%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 20%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.0%21.4–26.8
High blood pressure among adults30.4%27.2–33.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
Depression among adults26.4%23.0–30.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.9%8.7–11.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.3%29.8–37.1
Obesity among adults36.6%30.6–42.8
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.7%10.4–15.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.5%8.1–11.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.0%68.2–73.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.0%72.4–79.5
Cholesterol screening among adults79.7%77.4–82.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.4%60.8–69.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.8%58.4–65.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.5–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.3%15.4–21.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%14.2–18.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.1%23.3–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults38.8%33.3–44.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.1%16.8–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.6–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.0–15.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%17.2–21.5
Any disability among adults34.5%30.6–38.7
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults8.9%8.0–10.0
Mobility disability among adults12.8%11.4–14.6
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.7%4.3–5.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.5–24.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.1–16.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.9–12.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.0–14.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.1%8.0–10.3
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.4–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.9–10.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36412.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–649.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)8.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle0.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32286.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate64.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households46.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+8.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age31.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income$66,935$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value$217,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured