ZIP code

65610

in Billings, MissouriPopulation 5,561

ZipVitals Score

How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

47.67/ 100

Ranked #19,364 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #286 of 993 Missouri ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #23 of 52 Springfield, MO ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

Jump to a section

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

2.1 mi

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th

US11th

Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.4%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st

US87th

Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Billings, Missouri (ZIP 65610) lands in the bottom 40% nationally (19,364th) and the top 29% of Missouri (286th).

The signals balance out across the profile, strengths against concerns: homeownership rests in the top 10.2% nationally, and poverty stands in the bottom 19% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies in the bottom 24% nationally. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site lands in the bottom 11.4% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 13.2% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians settles at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 19% nationally. Childcare registers at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes rests in the top 25% nationally.

A note on the terms: distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 65631, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Springfield, MO metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare withinUnited StatesMissouriMetro area

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

close to the middle of the United States

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of the United States

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 33%

Disability

healthier than 36%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of Missouri

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Disability

healthier than 66%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 62%

About typical

close to the middle of Missouri

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 58%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of Missouri

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

DomainHow this ZIP comparesShare

Lifting this score

healthier than most of this metro area

Preventive Care

healthier than 64%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

Disability

healthier than 61%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

About typical

close to the middle of this metro area

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

Holding it back

less healthy than most of this metro area

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Arthritis among adults	32.4%	29.7–35.4
High blood pressure among adults	38.2%	34.9–41.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults	9.6%	8.8–10.5
Current asthma among adults	10.8%	9.8–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults	7.4%	6.7–8.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults	8.9%	8.0–10.0
Depression among adults	24.9%	22.0–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults	12.4%	11.0–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened	38.8%	35.3–42.3
Obesity among adults	38.3%	32.4–44.4
Stroke among adults	3.8%	3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years	16.3%	13.8–19.1

PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years	7.7%	6.6–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure	78.9%	76.5–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults	79.2%	76.3–81.8
Cholesterol screening among adults	85.7%	84.1–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years	63.2%	59.1–67.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults	60.4%	57.2–63.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years	72.6%	66.0–78.8

Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Binge drinking among adults	15.7%	13.4–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults	17.3%	15.2–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults	29.4%	25.6–33.4
Short sleep duration among adults	38.9%	33.7–44.4

Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults	21.1%	18.7–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults	17.5%	15.8–19.2
Frequent physical distress among adults	15.4%	13.8–17.1

DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults	17.3%	15.6–19.0
Any disability among adults	37.8%	34.1–41.8
Hearing disability among adults	9.2%	8.4–10.1
Independent living disability among adults	9.2%	8.3–10.2
Mobility disability among adults	17.2%	15.4–19.2
Self-care disability among adults	4.0%	3.6–4.4
Vision disability among adults	4.9%	4.5–5.4

Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS

Measure	Crude prevalence	95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults	19.3%	16.8–21.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	12.0%	10.3–13.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults	9.3%	7.8–10.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults	10.5%	9.0–11.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults	7.5%	6.6–8.3
Loneliness among adults	30.7%	26.9–34.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults	7.8%	6.8–8.7

Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	MO median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate	5.0%	10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364	12.3% (3.2–26.0%) n=1,009
Uninsured 18–64	6.3%	9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286	13.2% (3.5–28.4%) n=1,006
No HS diploma (25+)	8.4%	7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505	9.5% (2.5–20.5%) n=1,009
Bachelor's or higher (25+)	25.8%	23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505	18.1% (7.2–40.2%) n=1,009
Unemployment rate (16+)	1.9%	3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274	2.9% (0.0–8.5%) n=1,003
Households without a vehicle	1.4%	3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322	4.1% (0.0–11.9%) n=1,009
Broadband subscription	90.5%	89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322	86.3% (72.7–95.2%) n=1,009
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)	31.3%	23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322	20.7% (8.4–33.9%) n=1,009
Homeownership rate	94.0%	78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322	79.4% (56.0–94.3%) n=1,009
Crowded housing (>1 per room)	2.9%	1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322	1.1% (0.0–5.1%) n=1,009
Foreign-born population	0.6%	2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553	0.8% (0.0–6.4%) n=1,010
Single-parent households	59.7%	53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087	55.0% (39.5–75.6%) n=1,005
Population 65+	19.2%	19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553	19.2% (11.7–31.1%) n=1,010
Median age	45.4 yr	42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292	41.5 yr (33.3–55.9) n=1,005
Median household income	$77,155	$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318	$61,740 ($42,457–$95,231) n=948
Median home value	$287,500	$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049	$174,150 ($91,880–$309,500) n=930
Median gross rent	$858	$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670	$813 ($553–$1,265) n=786

Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based

Measure	Value	US median (p10–p90)	MO median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth	79.6 yr ± 0.72	78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308	77.6 yr (74.6–81.0) n=995

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 79.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

Statistically similar ZIPs nationally

Similar means a ZIP whose health profile is shaped like this one’s — the same pattern of strengths and weaknesses across the nine health domains behind the Score, not similar demographics or income. The percentage is how closely the two patterns line up. A very similar ZIP can still have a different overall Score.

21502Maryland97% similar
Score 44.17View 21502 Compare this ZIP with 21502
65706Missouri96% similar
Score 47.11View 65706 Compare this ZIP with 65706
65452Missouri96% similar
Score 46.80View 65452 Compare this ZIP with 65452
40068Kentucky96% similar
Score 46.97View 40068 Compare this ZIP with 40068
40391Kentucky96% similar
Score 44.15View 40391 Compare this ZIP with 40391
40142Kentucky95% similar
Score 47.51View 40142 Compare this ZIP with 40142
63383Missouri95% similar
Score 45.45View 63383 Compare this ZIP with 63383
65534Missouri95% similar
Score 45.68View 65534 Compare this ZIP with 65534
64062Missouri95% similar
Score 46.81View 64062 Compare this ZIP with 64062
63637Missouri95% similar
Score 44.12View 63637 Compare this ZIP with 63637

as of 2026

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured