Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38764

in Pace, MississippiPopulation 157

24.40/ 100

Ranked #31,525 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.7%)

Ranked #389 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

12.5%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

15.6%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

28.8%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

34.1%

in the top 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

18.5%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

61.3%

in the top 0.08% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

42%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

35.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

53.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

Pace, Mississippi (ZIP 38764), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 1.7% nationally (31,525th) and the bottom 4.2% of Mississippi (389th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled self-care disability rests in the top 0.06% nationally, vision disability settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and diabetes lands in the top 0.06% nationally. Modeled stroke rests in the top 0.2% nationally, mobility disability settles in the top 0.10% nationally, and independent living disability lands in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure rests in the top 0.08% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and obesity rests in the top 0.2% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 38726, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.4%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 11%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.2%36.4–44.0
High blood pressure among adults61.3%57.0–65.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.3–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults11.0%9.7–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.1%12.9–17.4
Depression among adults18.6%15.5–21.9
Diagnosed diabetes among adults28.8%25.5–32.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.0%39.2–48.3
Obesity among adults53.4%45.9–60.6
Stroke among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years35.1%30.0–40.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.6%12.0–19.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.4%83.3–87.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.9%84.4–89.2
Cholesterol screening among adults86.4%84.3–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.3%51.3–63.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults4.8%4.1–5.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.8%63.3–79.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.0%6.4–9.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.2%21.1–29.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults52.3%46.0–58.2
Short sleep duration among adults43.6%36.9–50.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults42.0%36.9–47.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.3%17.7–22.8
Frequent physical distress among adults21.3%18.5–24.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.4%20.2–26.6
Any disability among adults50.7%44.9–56.1
Hearing disability among adults8.5%7.4–9.6
Independent living disability among adults18.5%16.0–21.1
Mobility disability among adults34.1%30.1–38.1
Self-care disability among adults12.5%10.9–14.3
Vision disability among adults15.6%13.6–17.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults35.5%31.0–40.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults47.8%42.1–53.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults40.0%34.1–45.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults32.9%28.7–37.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults24.1%21.0–27.4
Loneliness among adults40.6%35.2–46.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults25.5%22.2–29.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–644.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)10.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle10.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription35.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate54.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households64.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+31.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age61.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$26,042$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$109,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$436$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 2.3778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.37 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured