Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36761

in Minter, AlabamaPopulation 869

25.15/ 100

Ranked #31,461 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.9%)

Ranked #609 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 1.7%)

Ranked #40 of 41 Montgomery, AL ZIPs (bottom 2.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

11.0%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27.1%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.3%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.5%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

31.5%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

60.4%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.3%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

39.9%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

33.7%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

47.6%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its severe level: severe means at least four of the six health-need readings and at least four of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • People living in poverty
  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Households with no vehicle
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Minter, Alabama (ZIP 36761), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 1.9% nationally (31,461st) and the bottom 1.7% of Alabama (609th).

continue reading

The clearest local signals in the data come through up front: modeled self-care disability stands in the top 0.4% nationally, diabetes lands in the top 0.2% nationally, and stroke is in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability resides in the top 1.0% nationally, mobility disability rests in the top 0.3% nationally, and high blood pressure lies in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled independent living disability sits in the top 0.9% nationally, and fair or poor health settles in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss registers in the top 1.6% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 1.1% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, elder services runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 36030, just across the boundary. Looking wider, the ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Montgomery, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.9%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 34%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.5%36.5–42.5
High blood pressure among adults60.4%57.2–63.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.7%7.1–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.7–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults12.4%11.3–13.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.8%13.2–16.4
Depression among adults20.7%18.3–23.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.1%24.8–29.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened46.5%43.1–49.9
Obesity among adults51.0%44.9–57.1
Stroke among adults8.3%7.7–9.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years33.7%29.8–37.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%12.7–17.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure83.8%81.9–85.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.5%82.2–86.6
Cholesterol screening among adults85.7%84.0–87.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.4%57.5–65.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults41.9%38.7–44.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%69.9–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.2%7.8–10.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.3%21.8–27.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults44.0%39.7–48.5
Short sleep duration among adults47.6%42.6–52.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults39.9%36.7–43.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%17.5–21.0
Frequent physical distress among adults20.6%18.7–22.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.5%19.5–23.6
Any disability among adults50.2%46.3–54.2
Hearing disability among adults11.0%10.0–12.1
Independent living disability among adults17.3%15.7–19.0
Mobility disability among adults31.5%28.8–34.3
Self-care disability among adults11.0%9.9–12.1
Vision disability among adults13.5%12.2–14.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.6%28.3–34.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults40.6%37.0–44.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults39.0%35.2–42.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.9%24.1–29.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.7%17.7–21.7
Loneliness among adults38.2%34.1–42.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults21.8%19.6–24.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate45.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6414.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)29.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle16.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription72.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)34.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate70.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households43.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+20.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age53.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$26,743$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$33,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$864$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.6 yr ± 1.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 72.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured