Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38732

in Cleveland, MississippiPopulation 16,696

38.62/ 100

Ranked #27,650 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 13.8%)

Ranked #249 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Outer-floodplain exposure

58.5%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.4%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.8%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

668 units

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

16.5%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

16.6%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

30.5%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

25%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.9%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST68th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Cleveland, Mississippi (ZIP 38732) places in the bottom 13.8% nationally (27,650th) and the bottom 39% of Mississippi (249th).

continue reading

The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: outer-floodplain exposure settles in the top 0.8% nationally, and modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 2.2% nationally. Modeled self-care disability lies in the top 4.4% nationally, and vision disability rests in the top 5.3% nationally. Modeled transportation resides in the top 4.5% nationally, utility shutoff is in the top 5.0% nationally, and food insecurity lands in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 7.3% nationally. On the better side, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 3.0% nationally. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs.

Beside the areas that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 72166, about 18 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 19%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 25%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 52%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.5 years. A median household income of $44,705 predicts 76.9 years — 2.0 years below.

    Ranked #2,579 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.5%27.5–33.7
High blood pressure among adults47.0%43.0–50.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%6.0–7.3
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%8.8–11.0
Depression among adults19.4%16.4–22.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.0%16.0–20.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.5%34.4–42.6
Obesity among adults43.2%36.5–49.9
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.0%21.3–29.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.1%11.2–15.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.9%77.6–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.8%79.7–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.0–86.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.3%54.9–65.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults9.3%7.9–10.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%67.0–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.6%10.3–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.4%16.0–20.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.4%33.7–43.1
Short sleep duration among adults36.8%30.9–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.1%26.1–32.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.3–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.4%17.2–21.7
Any disability among adults40.0%35.6–44.3
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.9–8.7
Independent living disability among adults12.9%11.5–14.2
Mobility disability among adults21.7%19.4–23.9
Self-care disability among adults7.4%6.8–8.1
Vision disability among adults9.8%8.9–10.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.1%26.4–33.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults30.5%27.6–33.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.3%20.8–26.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.3%19.8–24.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.5%14.9–18.3
Loneliness among adults38.2%33.3–43.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.8–18.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate28.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)14.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)34.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)5.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle8.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription83.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate61.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households37.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age35.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$44,705$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$160,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$810$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured