Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30665

in Siloam, GeorgiaPopulation 117

28.79/ 100

Ranked #30,983 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.4%)

Ranked #699 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 1.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

10.9%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27.8%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.3%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

13.9%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

30.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.1%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

39%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

57.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

8.1%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

35.1%

in the bottom 0.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

Siloam, Georgia (ZIP 30665), in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 3.4% nationally (30,983rd) and the bottom 1.7% of Georgia (699th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled self-care disability settles in the top 0.4% nationally, diabetes lands in the top 0.2% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled vision disability settles in the top 0.8% nationally, mobility disability lands in the top 0.4% nationally, and independent living disability rests in the top 1.0% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 0.9% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the top 0.4% nationally. Home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 0.7% nationally. On the better side, modeled binge drinking settles in the bottom 0.2% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 30642, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.7%33.7–41.8
High blood pressure among adults57.8%53.2–62.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.6%5.9–7.5
Current asthma among adults12.9%11.3–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.7%11.6–16.0
Depression among adults18.3%15.2–21.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.8%24.6–31.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.5%38.6–48.3
Obesity among adults49.4%40.2–58.3
Stroke among adults8.3%7.3–9.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.1%18.4–26.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.0%15.0–24.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.5%83.2–87.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.9%82.0–87.6
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%85.6–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.9%56.5–67.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.0%35.4–42.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.3%70.1–83.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.1%6.4–10.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.0%19.6–28.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults47.3%40.6–53.9
Short sleep duration among adults46.6%39.0–53.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults39.0%33.9–44.4
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%17.5–22.7
Frequent physical distress among adults21.4%18.6–24.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.3%17.3–23.6
Any disability among adults46.3%40.5–52.2
Hearing disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
Independent living disability among adults17.1%14.7–19.8
Mobility disability among adults30.8%26.9–35.0
Self-care disability among adults10.9%9.4–12.7
Vision disability among adults13.9%12.1–16.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults31.7%26.9–36.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults43.6%37.0–50.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults45.6%38.9–51.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.0%26.4–35.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults20.4%17.3–23.7
Loneliness among adults40.7%34.5–46.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults23.3%20.0–26.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription35.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate70.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households80.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+37.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age48.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$78,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 3.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.49 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured