Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39115

in Midnight, MississippiPopulation 138

22.81/ 100

Ranked #31,674 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.3%)

Ranked #400 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 1.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

13.1%

in the top 0.03% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

9.8%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

16.5%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

29.8%

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

36.2%

in the top 0.06% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

19.3%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

43%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

62%

in the top 0.07% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

35.1%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

13.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Midnight, Mississippi (ZIP 39115) ranks in the bottom 1.3% nationally (31,674th) and the bottom 1.5% of Mississippi (400th).

continue reading

A number of measures mark where this area is under strain: modeled self-care disability resides in the top 0.03% nationally, and stroke registers in the top 0.06% nationally. Modeled vision disability rests in the top 0.2% nationally, and diabetes stands in the top 0.05% nationally. Modeled mobility disability lies in the top 0.06% nationally, independent living disability lands in the top 0.3% nationally, and fair or poor health sits in the top 0.3% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the top 0.07% nationally, tooth loss settles in the top 1.2% nationally, and coronary heart disease resides in the top 0.4% nationally.

Close by, ZIP 39038, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. Modeled diabetes resides in the top 0.05% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 65%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 13%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults42.2%38.2–46.3
High blood pressure among adults62.0%57.8–66.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.9%7.0–8.8
Current asthma among adults12.5%10.9–14.2
Coronary heart disease among adults13.8%12.0–15.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults17.3%14.5–20.4
Depression among adults20.1%16.9–23.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults29.8%26.4–33.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.1%40.4–50.1
Obesity among adults54.1%45.6–63.3
Stroke among adults9.8%8.5–11.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years35.1%30.2–40.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.4%11.9–21.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.7%83.6–87.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.0%83.2–88.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%83.5–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years58.8%53.0–64.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults5.4%4.4–6.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.2%63.7–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.0%6.4–10.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.5%20.6–30.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults52.3%45.0–59.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.6%35.6–49.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults43.0%37.0–49.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.8%17.0–22.5
Frequent physical distress among adults22.6%19.4–26.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults23.9%20.0–28.0
Any disability among adults54.0%47.4–60.1
Hearing disability among adults11.6%10.2–13.3
Independent living disability among adults19.3%16.1–22.8
Mobility disability among adults36.2%31.5–41.1
Self-care disability among adults13.1%10.9–15.4
Vision disability among adults16.5%13.9–19.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults33.6%28.4–38.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults44.3%36.7–51.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults36.9%29.6–43.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults28.9%23.8–33.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults22.9%18.9–26.7
Loneliness among adults39.2%33.4–45.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults23.1%19.4–26.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate82.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle5.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription94.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)71.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households22.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+13.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age8.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$57,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.9 yr ± 3.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 3.09 years of 80.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured