Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38726

in Beulah, MississippiPopulation 345

24.86/ 100

Ranked #31,487 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.9%)

Ranked #388 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 4.5%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

11.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

8.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

27.7%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

14.7%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

33.2%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

17.7%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

60.3%

in the top 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

40.8%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

34.6%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

8.2%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

The read

Judged by its overall standing, Beulah, Mississippi (ZIP 38726) sits in the bottom 1.9% nationally (31,487th) and the bottom 4.5% of Mississippi (388th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: modeled self-care disability lands in the top 0.2% nationally, stroke rests in the top 0.2% nationally, and diabetes settles in the top 0.2% nationally. Modeled vision disability lands in the top 0.6% nationally, mobility disability rests in the top 0.2% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lands in the top 0.2% nationally, and fair or poor health rests in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss settles in the top 1.3% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled binge drinking lands in the bottom 0.2% nationally.

Placed beside its immediate neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A healthier nearby ZIP overall is ZIP 38725, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 1%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 17%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults40.4%36.6–44.4
High blood pressure among adults60.3%56.2–64.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.3%6.6–8.1
Current asthma among adults12.2%10.7–13.8
Coronary heart disease among adults12.3%11.0–13.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.1%13.1–17.4
Depression among adults18.8%15.9–22.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults27.7%24.6–31.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.8%40.2–49.2
Obesity among adults51.0%43.4–58.3
Stroke among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years34.6%29.8–39.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years15.3%12.2–18.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.4%83.4–87.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults86.5%83.9–88.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.9%84.8–88.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.9%50.3–61.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults4.8%4.0–5.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%64.4–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults8.2%6.6–10.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults24.6%20.7–28.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults51.3%45.3–57.5
Short sleep duration among adults42.4%35.8–49.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults40.8%36.1–45.7
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%17.3–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults21.2%18.6–24.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.7%19.8–25.9
Any disability among adults50.7%45.4–56.2
Hearing disability among adults10.5%9.3–11.8
Independent living disability among adults17.7%15.4–20.2
Mobility disability among adults33.2%29.5–37.2
Self-care disability among adults11.7%10.2–13.4
Vision disability among adults14.7%13.0–16.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.2%29.8–38.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults43.6%38.1–48.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults35.6%30.5–40.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.7%25.7–33.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults22.0%19.1–25.0
Loneliness among adults39.4%34.3–44.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.9%20.0–25.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate30.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6411.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)23.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)20.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle0.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription63.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate75.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households23.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+27.8%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age50.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$31,929$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$59,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$443$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 0.8678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.86 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured