Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36908

in Gilbertown, AlabamaPopulation 1,795

37.52/ 100

Ranked #28,270 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.9%)

Ranked #476 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.86%

in the bottom 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

6.1%

in the bottom 2.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.2%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.8%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.8%

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

142.8 days/year

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

29.6%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

8.6%

in the bottom 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

12.5%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.8%

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST70th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Gilbertown, Alabama (ZIP 36908) lands in the bottom 11.9% nationally (28,270th) and the bottom 23% of Alabama (476th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 4.3% nationally, and high cholesterol registers in the top 3.0% nationally. Modeled mobility disability rests in the top 7.3% nationally, and humid heat stands in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health lies in the top 9.1% nationally, independent living disability lands in the top 8.8% nationally, and diabetes sits in the top 8.8% nationally. On the better side, modeled arsenic is in the bottom 0.6% nationally, modeled pfas settles in the bottom 2.2% nationally, and housing-cost burden resides in the bottom 7.9% nationally.

A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 36904, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 97%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 57%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 95.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 6.5 (bottom 10%) — 89 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #151 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.2%34.4–42.1
High blood pressure among adults49.2%44.6–53.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.6
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.2
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.7–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
Depression among adults26.4%22.6–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.8%15.6–20.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.8%41.0–50.7
Obesity among adults42.7%34.1–51.5
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.1%18.2–26.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.0%9.0–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.2–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%77.5–84.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.2%83.2–87.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%57.6–68.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.0%45.8–54.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.7%64.4–79.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.0%10.5–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.5%17.4–23.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.1%29.9–40.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%32.0–46.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.6%25.9–33.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.7–21.2
Frequent physical distress among adults18.2%16.0–20.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.1%16.8–21.5
Any disability among adults44.1%39.0–48.9
Hearing disability among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Independent living disability among adults12.5%11.0–14.0
Mobility disability among adults22.8%19.9–25.7
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.5–6.9
Vision disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.5%21.7–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.4%19.1–25.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.0%15.3–20.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.5%12.4–16.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.5–12.4
Loneliness among adults35.5%30.2–41.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.1–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6412.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)11.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)2.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle1.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription79.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate90.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households57.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+20.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age40.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$68,125$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$111,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$983$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 1.4278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured