Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36921

in Toxey, AlabamaPopulation 1,072

37.49/ 100

Ranked #28,290 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 11.8%)

Ranked #479 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.90%

in the bottom 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

5.5%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

65.3 per 100,000 residents per year

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

22.8 mi

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

68%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST9th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.5%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.7%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST75th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

141.8 days/year

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST80th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

The read

Toxey, Alabama (ZIP 36921), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 11.8% nationally (28,290th) and the bottom 23% of Alabama (479th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: fatal road crashes lies in the top 1.8% nationally, and distance to an emergency room rests in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure resides in the top 4.6% nationally, and home broadband subscription is in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 3.5% nationally, hearing disability stands in the top 6.5% nationally, and mobility disability registers in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled humid heat settles in the top 6.9% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 0.9% nationally, and pfas lies in the bottom 1.6% nationally.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 36784, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 99%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 43%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 49%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 20%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 22%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 96.1 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 6.5 (bottom 10%) — 90 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #129 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.7%34.0–41.5
High blood pressure among adults48.9%44.5–53.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.0–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.4–11.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.0%10.4–13.6
Depression among adults26.2%22.4–30.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%15.6–20.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.5%40.9–50.1
Obesity among adults41.7%33.5–50.2
Stroke among adults5.5%5.0–6.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.4%16.8–24.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.3%9.3–13.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.2%78.7–83.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.3%78.0–84.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.5–86.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.9%62.7–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%47.8–56.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.4%65.0–80.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.1–15.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.9%16.2–21.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.0%29.9–40.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.0%31.1–45.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.3%25.8–33.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.8%16.7–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.8%15.7–20.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.1%16.9–21.5
Any disability among adults44.8%39.7–50.0
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.2–12.8
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.1–14.2
Mobility disability among adults22.7%19.8–25.6
Self-care disability among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Vision disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults25.3%21.5–29.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults22.5%19.1–26.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.1%15.3–21.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.2–16.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.7–12.8
Loneliness among adults36.0%30.5–41.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.8–11.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–646.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)22.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)10.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle15.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription68.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)8.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate83.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households55.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+29.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age51.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$40,481$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$175,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.0 yr ± 1.1778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.17 years of 75.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured