Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

35592

in Vernon, AlabamaPopulation 4,357

38.91/ 100

Ranked #27,469 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.4%)

Ranked #433 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.3%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST69th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Grocery access

0.23 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

45.2%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.45 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

23.8%

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

22.1%

in the top 9.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST71st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.1%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.45 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

Vernon, Alabama (ZIP 35592), overall, ranks in the bottom 14.4% nationally (27,469th) and the bottom 30% of Alabama (433rd).

continue reading

Taken together, the data gives a genuinely mixed reading: mental-health providers registers in the top 3.4% nationally, fiber broadband resides in the top 4.1% nationally, and grocery settles in the top 5.8% nationally. Pharmacy is in the top 6.2% nationally, and outpatient sits in the top 9.4% nationally. On the other side, modeled high blood pressure lands in the top 5.5% nationally, and high cholesterol lies in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 9.1% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the top 9.3% nationally. Modeled hearing disability registers in the top 8.7% nationally.

ZIP 35574, just across the boundary, comes out healthier overall. Grocery registers in the top 5.8% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 85%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 8%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 51%

16%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 37%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Disability

healthier than 29%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 84.5; chronic-disease standing 8.1 (bottom 10%) — 76 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #687 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.9%32.3–39.8
High blood pressure among adults48.3%43.8–52.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.4–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.8%8.8–10.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults11.7%10.4–13.2
Depression among adults25.3%21.6–29.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.1%15.0–19.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened45.2%40.6–50.0
Obesity among adults41.7%33.2–50.6
Stroke among adults5.2%4.8–5.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.8%19.9–28.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%9.3–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%77.7–82.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.3–84.0
Cholesterol screening among adults85.3%83.3–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.8%60.4–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.0%47.8–56.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.6%65.1–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.9%10.4–15.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%17.3–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.4%28.4–39.0
Short sleep duration among adults39.5%32.3–47.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.2%25.0–31.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.8–21.3
Frequent physical distress among adults17.7%15.7–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.8%16.7–21.3
Any disability among adults43.3%38.5–48.5
Hearing disability among adults11.1%10.0–12.5
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.0–13.8
Mobility disability among adults22.1%19.5–25.0
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.7–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.7%20.8–28.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.4%18.4–24.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.6–19.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.2%12.2–16.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.3–11.9
Loneliness among adults35.4%29.8–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.8–11.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate20.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–647.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)16.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)5.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle9.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription75.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate68.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households50.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+25.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age45.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$45,526$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$119,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$523$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 0.8178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.81 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured