Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

39443

in Laurel, MississippiPopulation 22,767

45.66/ 100

Ranked #21,698 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #100 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

139.6 days/year

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

30.2%

in the bottom 10.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 39443, one of several in Laurel, Mississippi ranks in the bottom 32% nationally (21,698th) and the top 25% of Mississippi (100th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled short sleep resides in the bottom 10.5% nationally, and radon stands in the bottom 11.0% nationally. Fiber broadband sits in the top 17% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing resides in the top 18% nationally. By contrast, modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 2.7% nationally, expected annual loss sits in the top 7.3% nationally, and humid heat resides in the top 7.5% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure stands in the top 11.6% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs. Modeled disaster risk resides in the top 18% nationally.

Against its neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 39464, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 70%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 24%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 25%

13%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 76%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 65%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 68%

8%

Disability

healthier than 74%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 75.7 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $59,388 predicts 78.0 years — 2.4 years below.

    Ranked #3,232 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.6%29.4–35.8
High blood pressure among adults45.3%41.4–49.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.6–10.2
Current asthma among adults9.6%8.5–10.8
Coronary heart disease among adults8.3%7.5–9.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.4%8.5–10.4
Depression among adults20.5%17.6–23.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.0%13.2–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.5%37.4–45.4
Obesity among adults39.3%33.1–45.7
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.2%14.4–20.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.6%9.2–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.1%78.7–83.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.0–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.2–88.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.7%59.0–68.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults10.4%8.9–12.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.1%65.7–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.8%11.5–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.9%29.8–38.4
Short sleep duration among adults30.2%25.3–35.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.9%20.5–25.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.4%14.7–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.2%13.7–17.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.8%15.1–18.6
Any disability among adults37.7%33.8–41.8
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Independent living disability among adults9.9%9.0–10.9
Mobility disability among adults18.9%16.9–20.9
Self-care disability among adults4.9%4.6–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.3%5.8–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.2%22.9–29.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.9–19.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.4–11.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%11.1–14.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Loneliness among adults34.6%30.1–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.4–9.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6417.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)11.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)3.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle4.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription80.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate81.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households47.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+21.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age39.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$59,388$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$153,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$763$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.6 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 75.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured