ZIP code
36524
in Coffeeville, AlabamaPopulation 1,088
36.17/ 100
Ranked #28,922 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.9%)
Ranked #510 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (bottom 18%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Arsenic in groundwater
0.91%
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST11thUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
52.4%
in the top 1.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST84thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Outpatient-care access
0.99 per 1,000 residents
in the top 2.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.
Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
20.3%
in the top 3.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST82ndUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.1%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Unemployment rate
17.6%
in the top 2.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
24.7%
in the top 3.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST86thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
61.3%
in the bottom 3.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST4thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
26.9%
in the top 5.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST89thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›PFAS in drinking water
7.4%
in the bottom 4.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS4thDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Coffeeville, Alabama (ZIP 36524) places in the bottom 9.9% nationally (28,922nd) and the bottom 18% of Alabama (510th).
The measures that matter most for this area lead the way: modeled high blood pressure settles in the top 1.7% nationally, and diabetes sits in the top 3.4% nationally. Modeled stroke lies in the top 3.6% nationally, and unemployment rests in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled mobility disability resides in the top 3.9% nationally, home broadband subscription is in the bottom 3.1% nationally, and modeled tooth loss lands in the top 5.3% nationally. On the better side, modeled arsenic stands in the bottom 1.0% nationally, outpatient registers in the top 2.0% nationally, and modeled pfas settles in the bottom 4.0% nationally.
For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 36451, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
About typical
Mental Health
healthier than 45%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 12%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 40%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 17%
11%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 17%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 23%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 95%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 68%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 12%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 25%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 38%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 32%
11%
Disability
healthier than 16%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 16%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 17%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 94.4 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 3.7 (bottom 10%) — 91 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #101 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
36451
Alabamashares a border
Score 42.45
Closest healthier
36538
Alabamashares a border
Score 45.65
Similar health profile
29593
South Carolina99% similar profile
Score 32.34
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 38.2% | 34.0–42.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 52.4% | 47.4–56.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.5% | 8.5–10.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.7% | 9.3–12.1 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 10.6% | 9.3–11.8 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 11.7% | 10.0–13.4 |
| Depression among adults | 22.8% | 18.9–26.4 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 20.3% | 17.6–23.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 45.0% | 39.9–49.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 43.7% | 35.1–52.2 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.1% | 5.5–6.8 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 26.9% | 22.5–31.7 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.6% | 9.4–13.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 82.6% | 79.8–84.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 82.8% | 79.1–85.6 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 86.9% | 84.7–88.7 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.9% | 57.4–68.1 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 47.3% | 43.2–51.4 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 73.1% | 64.9–80.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 11.1% | 8.7–13.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 19.5% | 16.3–22.8 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.6% | 30.7–42.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 42.0% | 34.9–49.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 31.4% | 27.3–35.5 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.6% | 15.2–19.8 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.0% | 15.6–20.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 18.4% | 15.9–20.8 |
| Any disability among adults | 45.7% | 40.1–51.1 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 11.1% | 9.7–12.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.9% | 11.2–14.6 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 24.7% | 21.3–28.1 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 6.9% | 6.0–7.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.6% | 7.5–9.6 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 28.4% | 24.3–32.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 25.8% | 22.0–30.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 20.3% | 17.1–23.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 16.9% | 14.5–19.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 12.0% | 10.4–13.8 |
| Loneliness among adults | 37.4% | 31.9–43.3 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 11.9% | 10.2–13.8 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 17.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 15.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 22.5% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 13.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 21.4% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 13.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 10.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 16.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 17.6% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622 |
| Households without a vehicle | 3.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622 |
| Broadband subscription | 61.3% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 84.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 18.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 21.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622 |
| Homeownership rate | 74.3% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628 |
| Single-parent households | 49.4% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 50.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617 |
| Population 65+ | 35.6% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 19.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628 |
| Median age | 49.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 41.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621 |
| Median household income | $45,962 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587 |
| Median home value | $85,600 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568 |
| Median gross rent | $646 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $856 ($625–$1,266) n=503 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | AL median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 74.9 yr ± 1.78 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 74.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.78 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured