Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

36606

in Mobile, AlabamaPopulation 18,728

43.15/ 100

Ranked #24,237 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #298 of 619 Alabama ZIPs (top 48%)

Ranked #18 of 35 Mobile, AL ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Walkability

200 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Humid extreme heat

144.5 days/year

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The average number of days per year when modeled heat stress — temperature, humidity, sun, and wind combined — reaches levels hard on the body outdoors.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.16 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

15.3%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

29%

in the top 7.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST81st
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

14.5%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

20.8%

in the top 7.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

48.7%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 36606, one of several in Mobile, Alabama, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 24% nationally (24,237th) and the top 48% of Alabama (298th).

continue reading

The profile carries real weight, and several readings make that plain: modeled short sleep is in the top 4.7% nationally, humid heat lies in the top 6.2% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the top 6.6% nationally. Modeled food insecurity is in the top 7.0% nationally, transportation lies in the top 7.1% nationally, and housing insecurity registers in the top 7.9% nationally. Homeownership is in the bottom 8.4% nationally. Better still, walkability lies in the top 2.5% nationally, and pharmacy registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Mental-health providers is in the top 6.2% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, humid heat is a modeled heat-stress measure combining temperature, humidity, sun, and wind to gauge heat on the body outdoors. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 36604, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Mobile, AL metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 71%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 82%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 79%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.6 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $51,303 predicts 77.4 years — 2.8 years below.

    Ranked #3,885 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.8–29.9
High blood pressure among adults43.3%40.1–46.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.2%5.7–6.8
Current asthma among adults10.3%9.2–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.3–9.1
Depression among adults21.9%19.2–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.0%15.3–18.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.9%34.7–41.2
Obesity among adults41.9%37.3–46.7
Stroke among adults4.5%4.2–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years23.0%19.6–26.8
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.4%9.8–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.8%75.3–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.5–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.2–86.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.1%60.9–69.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.9%45.6–52.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.7%73.1–83.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.3–15.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.8%14.7–19.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.9%29.2–36.8
Short sleep duration among adults43.9%39.5–48.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults25.7%23.1–28.5
Frequent mental distress among adults18.4%16.5–20.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.4%12.8–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.5–19.3
Any disability among adults37.0%33.4–40.7
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.1–7.6
Independent living disability among adults11.7%10.5–13.0
Mobility disability among adults18.8%16.9–20.9
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.4–6.5
Vision disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.7%26.5–33.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults29.0%26.1–31.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.3%21.8–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.8%18.5–23.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults14.5%13.0–16.1
Loneliness among adults36.3%32.5–40.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.5–17.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate18.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36415.4% (5.1–31.1%) n=623
Uninsured 18–6416.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28613.7% (5.2–25.2%) n=625
No HS diploma (25+)10.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50513.2% (3.6–23.0%) n=626
Bachelor's or higher (25+)31.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50516.9% (6.9–38.8%) n=626
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–11.0%) n=622
Households without a vehicle7.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.0% (0.0–12.1%) n=622
Broadband subscription81.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32284.9% (68.8–94.9%) n=622
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (10.1–35.0%) n=622
Homeownership rate48.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (54.7–92.5%) n=622
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–4.2%) n=622
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–6.2%) n=628
Single-parent households38.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08750.9% (35.0–68.6%) n=617
Population 65+12.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.9–29.2%) n=628
Median age33.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.3 yr (33.4–52.9) n=621
Median household income$51,303$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,896 ($37,738–$88,230) n=587
Median home value$172,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$160,950 ($87,300–$292,680) n=568
Median gross rent$980$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$856 ($625–$1,266) n=503
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.6 yr ± 0.7378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30874.7 yr (72.1–78.3) n=599

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.73 years of 74.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured