Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

30904

in Augusta, GeorgiaPopulation 23,400

42.65/ 100

Ranked #24,692 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranked #487 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #32 of 43 Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

40 per million

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.54 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

14.6%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

47.2%

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.58 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 30904, one of several in Augusta, Georgia ranks in the bottom 23% nationally (24,692nd) and the bottom 32% of Georgia (487th).

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: distance to a Superfund site lands at the national minimum, and PFOA in drinking water settles at the national maximum. PFOS in drinking water rests at the national maximum, and modeled air-toxics cancer risk lands in the top 4.5% nationally. PFAS in drinking water settles at the national maximum, modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 7.6% nationally, and homeownership lands in the bottom 7.7% nationally. On the encouraging side, distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Physicians rests in the top 6.0% nationally, and outpatient lands in the top 6.8% nationally.

Against its neighbors, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 29841, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Augusta-Richmond County, GA-SC metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 34%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 40%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 17%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 36%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $46,696 predicts 77.1 years — 3.9 years below.

    Ranked #5,013 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.1 years. The 43 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.7 years — 2.5 years below them.

    Ranked #1,954 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.1 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.1–29.8
High blood pressure among adults41.6%38.0–45.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.0%6.3–7.6
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.5
Depression among adults21.7%18.6–25.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.8%15.0–18.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.1%35.4–42.9
Obesity among adults35.7%30.2–41.5
Stroke among adults4.7%4.3–5.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.1%17.1–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.5%12.6–16.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%76.0–80.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%76.1–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%83.0–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%59.8–68.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.0%49.5–56.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%67.2–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.5%11.2–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%15.3–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%26.8–34.5
Short sleep duration among adults40.6%35.6–45.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.2%23.6–29.0
Frequent mental distress among adults19.5%17.4–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.3%15.5–19.2
Any disability among adults35.4%31.7–39.3
Hearing disability among adults6.8%6.0–7.6
Independent living disability among adults11.8%10.6–13.0
Mobility disability among adults18.3%16.3–20.3
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.8
Vision disability among adults8.0%7.4–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%23.0–30.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.9%22.9–28.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.3%21.7–26.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.5%18.0–23.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.7%12.1–15.3
Loneliness among adults37.1%32.3–42.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.9–16.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate23.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6418.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)12.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)30.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle10.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription81.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)38.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate47.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households47.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age36.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$46,696$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$199,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$995$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.2 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 73.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured