Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

72204

in Little Rock, ArkansasPopulation 30,525

33.84/ 100

Ranked #29,792 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 7.1%)

Ranked #458 of 562 Arkansas ZIPs (bottom 19%)

Ranked #55 of 59 Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR ZIPs (bottom 6.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Vision disability

10.5%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

49.2%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.7%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

22.7%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

28.7%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.5%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

27.6%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

684 units

in the top 2.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 72204, one of several in Little Rock, Arkansas, by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 7.1% nationally (29,792nd) and the bottom 19% of Arkansas (458th).

continue reading

The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled vision disability lands in the top 3.9% nationally, obesity is in the top 0.9% nationally, and self-care disability resides in the top 3.6% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff rests in the top 1.5% nationally, tooth loss lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 2.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health settles in the top 4.3% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity stands in the top 2.6% nationally. More encouragingly, subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 2.8% nationally.

Held up against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined in plain terms, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 72202, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 4%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 23%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 35%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 16%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

3 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $40,882 predicts 76.5 years — 3.4 years below.

    Ranked #4,575 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.0 years. The 47 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.3 years — 3.2 years below them.

    Ranked #2,475 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Highest-risk tenth

    Air toxics and the years between the two ends of the risk scale

    Modeled air-toxics cancer risk is 40.0 cases per million — among the tenth of compared ZIP codes with the most. Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.0 years.

    Ranked #504 of the 4,173 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by modeled air-toxics risk, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.3%25.7–30.8
High blood pressure among adults49.3%46.0–52.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.9%7.1–8.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Depression among adults22.4%19.5–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.5%16.4–20.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.0%32.8–39.1
Obesity among adults49.2%44.3–53.8
Stroke among adults5.6%5.1–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.7%25.1–32.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years16.2%14.2–18.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.9%74.3–79.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.1%78.2–83.6
Cholesterol screening among adults83.2%81.1–85.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.7%57.6–65.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.0%41.9–48.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.7%71.0–81.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.0%9.9–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.1%16.7–21.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.8%35.7–43.8
Short sleep duration among adults45.5%41.4–49.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.0%29.9–36.1
Frequent mental distress among adults20.6%18.4–22.8
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.3–19.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.7%19.4–24.0
Any disability among adults43.7%39.8–47.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Independent living disability among adults14.0%12.6–15.4
Mobility disability among adults23.3%21.0–25.6
Self-care disability among adults7.7%7.0–8.3
Vision disability among adults10.5%9.6–11.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.1%30.7–37.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.7%32.4–39.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults28.5%25.6–31.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults27.6%24.8–30.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.6%16.8–20.7
Loneliness among adults38.4%34.7–42.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.7%20.5–25.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (4.0–30.6%) n=574
Uninsured 18–6419.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28611.3% (1.5–24.1%) n=573
No HS diploma (25+)10.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.0% (3.7–23.0%) n=577
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50515.5% (4.4–30.5%) n=577
Unemployment rate (16+)6.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.9% (0.0–11.6%) n=573
Households without a vehicle12.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–12.5%) n=574
Broadband subscription90.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32283.2% (65.0–94.7%) n=574
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.4% (4.3–33.2%) n=574
Homeownership rate58.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.6% (57.7–96.1%) n=574
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.3% (0.0–5.7%) n=574
Foreign-born population7.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.8% (0.0–6.5%) n=578
Single-parent households36.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.0% (35.3–79.3%) n=571
Population 65+15.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.6–37.9%) n=578
Median age36.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.6 yr (33.6–58.1) n=573
Median household income$40,882$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$53,893 ($36,003–$79,139) n=505
Median home value$124,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$128,200 ($73,260–$235,420) n=519
Median gross rent$1,064$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$800 ($568–$1,094) n=393
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)AR median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.1 yr ± 0.5378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.4–79.7) n=580

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.53 years of 73.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured