Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

60649

in Chicago, IllinoisPopulation 48,056

39.00/ 100

Ranked #27,394 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 14.6%)

Ranked #1,320 of 1,368 Illinois ZIPs (bottom 3.6%)

Ranked #352 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 5.9%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Subsidized affordable housing

1,758 units

in the top 0.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

47.1%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$1

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US99th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

31.5%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

22.8%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

37.1%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

39.5%

in the top 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

20.1%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

25.1%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 60649, one of several in Chicago, Illinois lands in the bottom 14.6% nationally (27,394th) and the bottom 3.6% of Illinois (1,320th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled short sleep lies in the top 1.3% nationally, and expected annual loss resides in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the top 1.2% nationally, and self-care disability registers in the top 3.3% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff sits in the top 1.4% nationally, households without a vehicle rests in the top 1.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity is in the top 2.0% nationally. Modeled transportation noise stands in the top 2.5% nationally, and homeownership settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Better still, subsidized affordable housing lies in the top 0.4% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, industrial-pollution burden runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 60617, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 59%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 51%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 24%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 13%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 60%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 8%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $44,175 predicts 76.9 years — 4.8 years below.

    Ranked #5,477 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 72.0 ± 1.1 years. The 42 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.4 years — 4.3 years below them.

    Ranked #3,161 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.7–29.1
High blood pressure among adults44.6%41.8–47.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Current asthma among adults13.3%12.0–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.9–9.8
Depression among adults18.5%16.4–20.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.9%17.0–20.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened33.8%31.1–36.3
Obesity among adults44.1%40.2–47.8
Stroke among adults5.7%5.3–6.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years25.0%21.5–28.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.7%10.1–13.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.0%75.6–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.4%80.2–84.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.9–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years57.7%53.7–61.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults49.0%45.8–52.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.8%69.3–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.1%11.5–14.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.7%15.6–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.7%29.4–36.0
Short sleep duration among adults47.1%43.3–51.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.8%27.2–32.4
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.3–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.6–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.3–18.7
Any disability among adults36.0%33.0–39.1
Hearing disability among adults4.9%4.4–5.4
Independent living disability among adults13.3%12.1–14.6
Mobility disability among adults20.9%18.9–22.8
Self-care disability among adults7.8%7.1–8.4
Vision disability among adults9.6%8.8–10.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults34.7%31.6–37.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults39.5%36.3–42.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults42.8%39.2–46.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults31.5%28.7–34.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults19.1%17.2–21.0
Loneliness among adults39.3%36.0–42.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults22.8%20.5–25.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate27.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.4% (3.4–21.4%) n=1,378
Uninsured 18–6412.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.6% (1.7–15.2%) n=1,375
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.5% (2.1–16.1%) n=1,377
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.6% (9.3–49.2%) n=1,377
Unemployment rate (16+)14.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.7–10.0%) n=1,375
Households without a vehicle37.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–11.8%) n=1,377
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32289.4% (77.4–96.0%) n=1,377
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)46.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.2% (10.7–34.7%) n=1,377
Homeownership rate25.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.9% (61.0–94.1%) n=1,377
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.9% (0.0–4.1%) n=1,377
Foreign-born population3.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.4% (0.0–17.6%) n=1,378
Single-parent households25.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.8% (39.6–70.3%) n=1,372
Population 65+18.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.4% (12.1–28.7%) n=1,378
Median age41.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.1 yr (34.3–52.1) n=1,373
Median household income$44,175$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$75,429 ($50,714–$114,949) n=1,334
Median home value$213,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$154,250 ($86,310–$346,100) n=1,332
Median gross rent$1,107$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$934 ($675–$1,653) n=1,170
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IL median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.0 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (75.5–82.2) n=1,348

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 72.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured