Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

66605

in Topeka, KansasPopulation 20,891

46.38/ 100

Ranked #20,896 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #517 of 682 Kansas ZIPs (bottom 24%)

Ranked #51 of 57 Topeka, KS ZIPs (bottom 10.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

196 units

in the top 12.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

12.5%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

16.6%

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Park land

6.5%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

66 intersections/sq mi

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US84th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

20.9%

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

13.9%

in the top 14.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

10.2%

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US78th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 66605, one of several in Topeka, Kansas ranks in the bottom 35% nationally (20,896th) and the bottom 24% of Kansas (517th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: transit lands in the top 10.4% nationally, and mental-health providers settles in the top 10.6% nationally. Subsidized affordable housing rests in the top 12.1% nationally, and park land lands in the top 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled utility shutoff settles in the top 12.6% nationally, extreme heat rests in the top 13.5% nationally, and housing insecurity lands in the top 15% nationally. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the top 15% nationally, radon rests in the top 17% nationally, and disaster risk lands in the top 16% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 66409, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Topeka, KS metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

8%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 19%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 25%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $59,106 predicts 78.0 years — 1.8 years below.

    Ranked #2,302 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.7 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.8 years — 2.6 years below them.

    Ranked #2,018 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.3%25.1–29.5
High blood pressure among adults40.1%37.4–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.5%6.9–8.2
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.1%7.3–9.0
Depression among adults23.1%20.7–25.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.0%12.5–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.6%37.8–43.4
Obesity among adults41.8%38.1–45.5
Stroke among adults3.9%3.6–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.0%12.5–17.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years13.9%12.2–15.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%75.3–80.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.7%76.1–81.1
Cholesterol screening among adults84.3%82.6–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%63.0–69.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.0%57.2–62.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.0%73.1–82.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%12.3–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.3%16.3–20.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.4%27.4–33.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.0%35.6–42.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.2%21.9–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults17.1%15.5–18.9
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%13.0–16.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.8–19.2
Any disability among adults36.0%33.0–39.1
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.4
Independent living disability among adults9.7%8.8–10.8
Mobility disability among adults17.2%15.5–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.2
Vision disability among adults6.4%5.9–6.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.8–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.9%18.7–23.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults13.5%11.8–15.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.6%14.8–18.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Loneliness among adults32.9%29.8–36.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.1–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.8% (2.7–20.7%) n=688
Uninsured 18–6417.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28610.6% (2.3–24.2%) n=686
No HS diploma (25+)9.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.7% (1.1–14.8%) n=689
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50524.0% (11.3–43.6%) n=689
Unemployment rate (16+)6.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–7.1%) n=689
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.8% (0.0–8.3%) n=688
Broadband subscription89.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.4% (75.3–96.9%) n=688
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32219.5% (7.8–31.9%) n=688
Homeownership rate70.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32279.7% (59.7–94.6%) n=688
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.6%) n=688
Foreign-born population5.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.1% (0.0–9.9%) n=692
Single-parent households41.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08755.7% (41.7–78.0%) n=684
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.6% (11.9–35.1%) n=692
Median age37.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.9 yr (32.2–56.9) n=689
Median household income$59,106$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$67,738 ($49,860–$97,877) n=659
Median home value$170,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$135,800 ($68,740–$290,700) n=627
Median gross rent$884$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$820 ($592–$1,257) n=519
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)KS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.8978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.9 yr (76.2–81.8) n=687

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.89 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured