Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

23952

in Lunenburg, VirginiaPopulation 84

36.38/ 100

Ranked #28,818 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.2%)

Ranked #827 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 5.3%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Stroke

7.8%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

24.6%

in the top 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

14.0%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

29.5%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

55.4%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

49.5%

in the top 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

9.1%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

41.7%

in the bottom 1.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.8%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.8%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Lunenburg, Virginia (ZIP 23952), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 10.2% nationally (28,818th) and the bottom 5.3% of Virginia (827th).

continue reading

The data opens on real and measurable burdens: modeled stroke stands in the top 0.4% nationally, and diabetes registers in the top 0.5% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 0.3% nationally, and mobility disability sits in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure lies in the top 0.8% nationally, modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 0.4% nationally, and home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 1.0% nationally. Modeled self-care disability is in the top 3.3% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the top 2.3% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled binge drinking stands in the bottom 0.5% nationally.

For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 23944, just across the boundary. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 0.7% nationally.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 46%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 52%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 91%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 82%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 31%

11%

Disability

healthier than 1%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults44.6%40.4–49.1
High blood pressure among adults55.4%50.8–60.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.1–13.8
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.4–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults14.0%12.5–15.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults15.1%13.0–17.5
Depression among adults22.7%19.3–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults24.6%21.6–27.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.5%44.5–54.6
Obesity among adults45.6%37.2–54.5
Stroke among adults7.8%7.0–8.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.3%18.7–26.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.0%7.6–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure87.2%84.8–89.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults85.1%82.1–87.7
Cholesterol screening among adults90.6%88.9–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.5%65.3–75.2
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.9%59.3–66.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%65.0–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults9.1%7.3–11.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.5%16.3–23.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.0%32.1–44.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%29.5–42.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.9%27.7–36.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.3–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults21.2%18.6–24.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%15.2–20.3
Any disability among adults45.7%40.4–51.2
Hearing disability among adults12.8%11.2–14.4
Independent living disability among adults13.6%11.9–15.7
Mobility disability among adults29.5%25.8–33.5
Self-care disability among adults7.8%6.8–9.0
Vision disability among adults9.4%8.2–10.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.3–26.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.9%16.5–23.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.8%16.5–23.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.7%10.6–15.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.8%8.4–11.5
Loneliness among adults31.9%26.6–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.8–10.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate33.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6419.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)23.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription41.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)41.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+33.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age59.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.4 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 75.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured