Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24530

in Callands, VirginiaPopulation 678

36.47/ 100

Ranked #28,770 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.3%)

Ranked #826 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 5.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

50.1%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

24.5%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

19.2%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.3%

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.8%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

98.6%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.6%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.2%

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

44.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Callands, Virginia (ZIP 24530) sits in the bottom 10.3% nationally (28,770th) and the bottom 5.4% of Virginia (826th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: homeownership rests in the top 5.4% nationally, and modeled arsenic sits in the bottom 6.6% nationally. On the other hand, home broadband subscription registers in the bottom 1.5% nationally, modeled mobility disability lands in the top 4.2% nationally, and modeled stroke resides in the top 4.7% nationally. Modeled diabetes lies in the top 5.2% nationally, and independent living disability settles in the top 5.8% nationally. Modeled self-care disability stands in the top 6.8% nationally, and coronary heart disease is in the top 6.0% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol rests in the top 4.6% nationally.

In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. ZIP 24054, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 13%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.1%33.6–40.8
High blood pressure among adults47.0%43.0–51.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.5–10.6
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.5–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.6%9.3–12.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.2%11.2–15.5
Depression among adults25.3%21.8–29.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults19.2%16.8–21.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened44.9%40.6–49.2
Obesity among adults43.1%36.5–49.9
Stroke among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.7%16.3–23.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%8.1–13.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.5%79.0–83.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.8%77.5–83.8
Cholesterol screening among adults85.5%83.2–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years61.9%57.0–66.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults55.3%51.6–58.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.6%69.8–82.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.5%10.2–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.4%17.6–25.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.6%30.9–42.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%30.2–40.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%25.0–34.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.2%16.8–21.8
Frequent physical distress among adults19.7%17.1–22.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%16.6–22.5
Any disability among adults43.7%38.2–49.1
Hearing disability among adults10.3%9.0–11.7
Independent living disability among adults13.3%11.2–15.4
Mobility disability among adults24.5%21.2–28.3
Self-care disability among adults6.8%5.8–7.9
Vision disability among adults8.4%7.2–9.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%18.8–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.1%17.3–25.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.1%17.1–25.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.5–16.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.2–12.8
Loneliness among adults34.3%29.4–39.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.2%8.5–11.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–645.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)49.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription50.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate98.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population1.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households93.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+46.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age62.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$36,165$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$178,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.7 yr ± 1.3978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.39 years of 75.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured