ZIP code
22488
in Kinsale, VirginiaPopulation 1,367
40.02/ 100
Ranked #26,743 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)
Ranked #777 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (bottom 11.0%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Diabetes
22.3%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Stroke
6.7%
in the top 1.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
26.3%
in the top 2.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Binge drinking
9.8%
in the bottom 1.1% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
52.1%
in the top 1.9% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
11.2%
in the top 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Self-care disability
7.1%
in the top 5.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS95thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›High cholesterol
46.2%
in the top 2.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST94thUS98thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
30.2%
in the top 8.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS92ndDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
71.1%
in the bottom 6.7% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST11thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›The read
Kinsale, Virginia (ZIP 22488), on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,743rd) and the bottom 11.0% of Virginia (777th).
What the numbers press hardest on defines much of the story here: modeled diabetes lies in the top 1.5% nationally, stroke settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled high blood pressure is in the top 1.9% nationally, coronary heart disease rests in the top 3.6% nationally, and self-care disability sits in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol registers in the top 2.5% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 8.0% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 6.7% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 1.1% nationally.
A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 22435, just across the boundary. Modeled binge drinking lies in the bottom 1.1% nationally.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 87%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 70%
8%
About typical
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 44%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 10%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 34%
11%
Disability
healthier than 7%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 19%
5%
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 77%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 79%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 79%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 6%
16%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 19%
11%
Disability
healthier than 6%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 37%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 19%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Clean environment, heavy chronic burden
Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions
Environmental-hazard standing 85.1; chronic-disease standing 2.0 (bottom 10%) — 83 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.
Ranked #356 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
22435
Virginiashares a border
Score 52.16
Closest healthier
22469
Virginiashares a border
Score 44.40
Similar health profile
28007
North Carolina99% similar profile
Score 38.12
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 40.8% | 36.7–45.1 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 52.1% | 47.4–56.8 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 10.1% | 9.0–11.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 11.9% | 10.5–13.5 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 11.2% | 9.8–12.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 12.1% | 10.0–14.3 |
| Depression among adults | 20.9% | 17.6–24.5 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 22.3% | 19.4–25.4 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 46.2% | 41.3–51.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 44.0% | 35.9–52.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.7% | 5.9–7.5 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 21.1% | 17.5–25.2 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 11.3% | 8.8–14.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 85.1% | 82.5–87.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 84.9% | 81.9–87.5 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 89.9% | 88.2–91.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 72.1% | 67.2–76.7 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 58.1% | 54.4–61.7 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 77.0% | 69.8–83.6 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 9.8% | 7.8–12.1 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.3% | 14.9–21.9 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 36.3% | 30.4–42.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 40.4% | 33.9–47.2 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 30.2% | 25.8–35.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.1% | 14.0–18.4 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 18.8% | 16.2–21.8 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 16.8% | 14.4–19.5 |
| Any disability among adults | 43.2% | 37.7–49.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 9.9% | 8.7–11.3 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.1% | 10.3–14.1 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 26.3% | 22.6–30.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 7.1% | 6.0–8.2 |
| Vision disability among adults | 8.7% | 7.5–10.1 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 24.8% | 21.1–28.7 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 22.6% | 18.6–26.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 21.8% | 17.8–26.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 15.9% | 13.3–18.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 11.1% | 9.5–12.9 |
| Loneliness among adults | 33.2% | 28.2–38.4 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 11.4% | 9.6–13.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | VA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 21.1% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 8.7% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 8.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 12.7% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 9.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 28.8% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 26.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 3.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860 |
| Households without a vehicle | 13.4% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 3.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862 |
| Broadband subscription | 71.1% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 87.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 37.2% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 23.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862 |
| Homeownership rate | 75.7% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 78.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 0.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 2.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874 |
| Single-parent households | 56.5% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855 |
| Population 65+ | 35.5% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874 |
| Median age | 59.5 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864 |
| Median household income | $45,313 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804 |
| Median home value | $431,300 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | VA median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled. | |||
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured