Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

19931

in Bethel, DelawarePopulation 375

39.84/ 100

Ranked #26,866 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #62 of 64 Delaware ZIPs (bottom 3.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High cholesterol

50.7%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.6%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.2%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

12.3%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

49.3%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

23.7%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.54%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

98.2%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.1%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Bethel, Delaware (ZIP 19931) lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,866th) and the bottom 3.2% of Delaware (62nd).

continue reading

Several serious readings shape the profile and deserve first mention: modeled high cholesterol lands in the top 0.3% nationally, coronary heart disease lies in the top 1.1% nationally, and stroke stands in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the top 3.5% nationally, high blood pressure registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and mobility disability resides in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled diabetes settles in the top 7.8% nationally. On the better side, modeled transportation noise is at the national minimum, and poverty sits in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Homeownership lands in the top 5.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. On the overall standing, ZIP 19956, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 96%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 56%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 51%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Disability

in the bottom 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.8%36.2–43.2
High blood pressure among adults49.3%45.3–53.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
Current asthma among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults12.6%11.1–14.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults14.0%12.0–16.4
Depression among adults22.8%19.5–26.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.1%15.8–20.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened50.7%46.6–54.7
Obesity among adults38.1%32.0–44.3
Stroke among adults6.2%5.5–7.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.6%19.3–26.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.0–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.4%82.0–86.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.2%80.3–85.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.8%85.9–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.5%62.2–70.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.6%49.0–56.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.2%67.9–80.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%10.1–14.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.6%17.4–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.2%31.0–41.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%29.7–39.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.6%23.9–31.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.3–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.3%17.1–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%13.8–18.4
Any disability among adults41.0%36.4–45.6
Hearing disability among adults12.3%10.9–13.7
Independent living disability among adults12.1%10.4–14.0
Mobility disability among adults23.7%20.5–27.0
Self-care disability among adults6.5%5.6–7.5
Vision disability among adults7.9%6.9–9.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.6%17.7–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.2–21.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.1%14.8–21.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.1–13.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Loneliness among adults30.1%26.4–34.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.6–10.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.2% (2.4–16.7%) n=62
Uninsured 18–641.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (3.2–18.9%) n=63
No HS diploma (25+)5.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.1% (3.2–15.9%) n=63
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.1% (13.0–59.9%) n=63
Unemployment rate (16+)6.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.9–8.9%) n=63
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–9.1%) n=62
Broadband subscription80.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.8% (85.5–97.0%) n=62
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)16.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (17.0–38.0%) n=62
Homeownership rate98.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.6% (59.5–92.0%) n=62
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.8%) n=62
Foreign-born population1.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5537.1% (1.1–16.0%) n=64
Single-parent households68.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08752.4% (43.2–77.6%) n=62
Population 65+22.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.2% (13.0–42.2%) n=64
Median age54.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (34.9–62.0) n=64
Median household income$99,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$82,604 ($60,703–$125,491) n=61
Median home value$294,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$322,500 ($243,800–$534,600) n=61
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,370 ($1,106–$1,655) n=55
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)DE median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.4 yr ± 1.3678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (75.5–81.2) n=61

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.36 years of 75.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured