Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

28375

in Proctorville, North CarolinaPopulation 182

41.75/ 100

Ranked #25,438 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 21%)

Ranked #679 of 793 North Carolina ZIPs (bottom 14.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

33%

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.2%

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

48.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

11.5%

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US8th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

8.6%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Proctorville, North Carolina (ZIP 28375) stands in the bottom 21% nationally (25,438th) and the bottom 14.4% of North Carolina (679th).

continue reading

A number of readings press hard on the profile and set its tone: modeled tooth loss settles in the top 1.8% nationally, and stroke rests in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease lands in the top 4.7% nationally, and high blood pressure settles in the top 5.2% nationally. Modeled self-care disability rests in the top 7.4% nationally, and hearing disability lands in the top 6.5% nationally. On the brighter side, fiber broadband settles at the national maximum, and modeled binge drinking rests in the bottom 3.7% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 7.7% nationally.

For clarity, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. ZIP 28430, about 8.0 miles away, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 76%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 53%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 61%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 43%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 32%

16%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.5%33.4–39.7
High blood pressure among adults48.5%45.0–52.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.5%8.5–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults10.9%9.6–12.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.2%10.5–14.1
Depression among adults22.1%19.2–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.3%15.2–19.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.5%38.9–46.2
Obesity among adults43.4%38.1–48.8
Stroke among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years33.0%28.2–38.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.7%10.2–15.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%80.1–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.9%80.1–85.5
Cholesterol screening among adults86.1%84.0–88.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.2%63.9–72.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.2%53.6–60.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.4%74.3–85.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.2%9.3–13.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.0%15.5–21.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.6%28.4–37.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.1%29.4–38.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.3%23.9–31.1
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.2–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults16.6%14.7–19.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults18.2%15.9–20.8
Any disability among adults40.1%35.9–44.7
Hearing disability among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.5–13.8
Mobility disability among adults22.0%19.3–25.1
Self-care disability among adults6.7%5.9–7.7
Vision disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.4%19.1–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.7%16.5–22.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults20.1%16.8–23.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.6–15.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.0%9.5–12.6
Loneliness among adults30.9%26.7–35.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.8–11.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.0% (4.4–25.0%) n=793
Uninsured 18–6426.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28614.5% (5.7–24.9%) n=794
No HS diploma (25+)5.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50510.4% (3.1–19.8%) n=798
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.8% (10.7–53.4%) n=798
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.2% (0.0–9.1%) n=796
Households without a vehicle2.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.9% (0.0–10.2%) n=793
Broadband subscription79.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.6% (76.2–96.3%) n=793
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32224.7% (14.1–36.5%) n=793
Homeownership rate80.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32275.0% (52.7–89.7%) n=793
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–4.5%) n=793
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.2% (0.0–12.9%) n=799
Single-parent households39.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08751.8% (39.2–70.1%) n=790
Population 65+31.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.7% (11.1–31.9%) n=799
Median age46.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.5 yr (33.3–55.7) n=797
Median household income$74,327$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,030 ($44,419–$97,111) n=749
Median home value$101,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$223,850 ($113,970–$452,990) n=758
Median gross rent$1,141$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$957 ($715–$1,575) n=687
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NC median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.9 yr ± 2.0378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.3 yr (74.6–80.8) n=747

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.03 years of 76.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured