Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

96860

HawaiiPopulation 4,710

64.82/ 100

Ranked #2,072 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 6.5%)

Ranked #9 of 92 Hawaii ZIPs (top 9.8%)

Ranked #8 of 33 Urban Honolulu, HI ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Broad coverage across health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

35.9%

in the top 0.02% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

14.2%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

10.9%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

43.4%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

1.7%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

0.90%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

0.60%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

2.6%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

2.5%

in the bottom 0.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

75.9%

in the top 0.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 96860, in Hawaii, by its composite score, sits in the top 6.5% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,072nd) and the top 9.8% of Hawaii (9th), based on limited data; treat as directional.

continue reading

The data opens on a genuinely even set of readings: modeled high cholesterol is in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and coronary heart disease registers in the bottom 0.4% nationally. Modeled stroke settles in the bottom 0.4% nationally, mobility disability sits in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and hearing disability lies in the bottom 0.5% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking rests in the top 0.02% nationally, modeled colon screening resides in the bottom 0.5% nationally, and slow internet speeds is in the top 0.8% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 96789, about 4.7 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.2%

22%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

17%

Environmental HazardPartial

healthier than 73%

14%

Disability

healthier than 99%

8%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 47%

9%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

6%

Holding it back

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

No data: Climate / Disaster Risk — not measured in this ZIP, so it is left out of the score entirely rather than estimated.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults4.7%4.0–5.4
High blood pressure among adults10.9%9.3–12.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults1.2%1.1–1.4
Current asthma among adults8.7%7.7–9.8
Coronary heart disease among adults0.9%0.8–1.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults1.4%1.1–1.7
Depression among adults19.5%16.7–22.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults1.7%1.5–2.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened14.2%12.4–16.2
Obesity among adults23.3%19.1–27.7
Stroke among adults0.6%0.5–0.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%5.9–9.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.1–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure27.6%24.1–31.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults63.5%59.1–67.4
Cholesterol screening among adults62.1%57.1–67.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years43.4%39.6–47.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.6%70.9–76.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.3%75.5–84.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults35.9%32.1–39.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.3%5.4–8.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults13.1%10.2–16.1
Short sleep duration among adults43.2%38.6–47.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults10.7%8.6–12.6
Frequent mental distress among adults19.7%16.5–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults6.7%5.6–7.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%12.9–19.0
Any disability among adults22.8%18.4–26.6
Hearing disability among adults2.5%2.1–2.9
Independent living disability among adults5.4%4.3–6.3
Mobility disability among adults2.6%2.2–3.1
Self-care disability among adults1.0%0.9–1.2
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.2–3.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.6%25.8–35.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.0%11.1–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%5.9–9.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.3–12.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.7%6.1–9.1
Loneliness among adults39.0%34.6–43.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.8–5.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.6% (5.2–19.8%) n=86
Uninsured 18–649.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (1.1–10.4%) n=86
No HS diploma (25+)0.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.2% (1.5–11.7%) n=90
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.6% (16.3–48.7%) n=90
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.5% (1.9–11.7%) n=89
Households without a vehicle3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.1% (0.0–11.0%) n=86
Broadband subscription89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32292.5% (84.3–96.6%) n=86
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32235.3% (21.1–49.6%) n=86
Homeownership rate78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32268.1% (46.6–84.7%) n=86
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3227.6% (3.1–16.2%) n=86
Foreign-born population5.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,55312.5% (5.0–27.3%) n=90
Single-parent households53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.6% (41.2–64.3%) n=86
Population 65+0.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.2% (12.9–29.5%) n=90
Median age22.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.8 yr (33.4–51.3) n=90
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$93,346 ($62,869–$124,659) n=83
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$811,050 ($388,170–$1,090,410) n=82
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,820 ($1,216–$2,442) n=80
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)HI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured