Skip to main content
ZipVitals

How the Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro's ZIP codes measure up on health

The ZipVitals Score across the Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro area — built one ZIP code at a time, then rolled up by resident population.

Data release 202643 of 44 ZIP codes scored · 1.2M residents represented

Score snapshot

55.83Metro-wide ZipVitals Scorepopulation-weighted average of its ZIP codes
57.04Median scoremiddle of 43 scored ZIPs
66.62Highest score84109 · Millcreek
40.79Lowest score84022 · Dugway
25.83Spreadpoints between highest & lowest ZIP

People & national context

#88Among 386 metrosby population-weighted average
31%Residents in below-average ZIPs0.37M of 1.2M, in ZIPs scoring under the national average (53.48)
1.2MResidents in the top 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
1.2MResidents in the bottom 50 ZIPs100% of the metro
0ZIPs in the national top 100

The Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro's ZIP codes, ranked

Highest-scoring

Top 43 of 43
  1. 1,39984109in Millcreek · 25,544 residents66.62
  2. 2,04284108in Emigration Canyon · 22,390 residents64.90
  3. 2,08984092in Sandy · 27,651 residents64.78
  4. 2,16984124in Millcreek · 22,609 residents64.58
  5. 2,98184093in Sandy · 23,871 residents62.98
  6. 3,20684121in Brighton · 38,912 residents62.54
  7. 3,47384020in Draper · 50,278 residents62.09
  8. 3,57184095in South Jordan · 38,532 residents61.90
  9. 3,79584105in Salt Lake City · 23,491 residents61.52
  10. 3,83884103in Salt Lake City · 23,749 residents61.46
  11. 4,21884117in Holladay · 24,980 residents60.86
  12. 4,46084106in Salt Lake City · 35,213 residents60.52
  13. 5,16784094in Sandy · 27,507 residents59.58
  14. 5,23584065in Bluffdale · 50,768 residents59.47
  15. 5,41384006in Bingham Canyon · 1,060 residents59.24
  16. 5,66384096in Herriman · 74,603 residents58.91
  17. 6,53084069in Rush Valley · 480 residents57.84
  18. 6,92784081in West Jordan · 52,314 residents57.36
  19. 7,06784080in Vernon · 438 residents57.21
  20. 7,22684071in Stockton · 2,020 residents57.05
  21. 7,23384107in Murray · 38,257 residents57.04
  22. 7,23584111in Salt Lake City · 12,782 residents57.04
  23. 7,31684101in Salt Lake City · 9,381 residents56.96
  24. 9,15284074in Tooele · 59,706 residents55.25
  25. 9,44084084in West Jordan · 31,542 residents55.00
  26. 10,10084047in Midvale · 37,411 residents54.48
  27. 10,31984088in West Jordan · 39,228 residents54.29
  28. 10,39084029in Grantsville · 14,869 residents54.24
  29. 10,42284102in Salt Lake City · 18,777 residents54.21
  30. 11,77284070in Sandy · 30,472 residents53.21
  31. 12,70884123in Taylorsville · 37,054 residents52.54
  32. 14,77984128in West Valley City · 32,126 residents51.05
  33. 15,03684112in Salt Lake City · 2,841 residents50.88
  34. 16,77384113in Salt Lake City · 264 residents49.61
  35. 17,77284118in West Valley City · 42,853 residents48.92
  36. 18,51484115in South Salt Lake · 28,882 residents48.32
  37. 19,27184044in Magna · 30,031 residents47.73
  38. 19,36884120in West Valley City · 50,799 residents47.67
  39. 22,28884116in Salt Lake City · 38,625 residents45.11
  40. 24,01884119in West Valley City · 50,070 residents43.39
  41. 24,56984083in Wendover · 1,261 residents42.78
  42. 24,66684104in Salt Lake City · 23,420 residents42.68
  43. 26,19484022in Dugway · 516 residents40.79
Open the full Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro ranking →One page, all 43 scored ZIPs — sortable by score, residents, or place

Where each domain sits inside this metro

The Score above is one number for the whole Salt Lake City-Murray, UT metro. Nine domains make it up, and they are not spread the same way across the people who live here. Each row divides this metro's ZIP codes into fifths by how they stand against each other on that domain, then counts who lives at each end. If a domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents, every row would read about 20%.

The highest-standing fifth

9 of 43 ZIPs

Share of the metro's residents living in the fifth of its ZIP codes that stand highest on each domain.

Disability26%308,847 people

Standing highest: 84105 Salt Lake City84108 Emigration Canyon84109 Millcreek

Chronic Disease Burden21%255,698 people

Standing highest: 84096 Herriman84112 Salt Lake City84113 Salt Lake City

Risk Behavior21%248,238 people

Standing highest: 84092 Sandy84108 Emigration Canyon84109 Millcreek

Healthcare Access20%239,824 people

Standing highest: 84070 Sandy84088 West Jordan84107 Murray

Preventive Care19%224,969 people

Standing highest: 84092 Sandy84093 Sandy84109 Millcreek

Social Need / SDOH19%223,987 people

Standing highest: 84101 Salt Lake City84109 Millcreek84111 Salt Lake City

Mental Health16%187,698 people

Standing highest: 84083 Wendover84092 Sandy84109 Millcreek

Environmental Hazard15%179,437 people

2 ZIP codes tie at this end: 84022 Dugway84069 Rush Valley84080 Vernon

Climate / Disaster Risk13%155,161 people

Standing highest: 84071 Stockton84080 Vernon84112 Salt Lake City

Each fifth is about 9 of this metro’s 43 compared ZIP codes, and the shares are out of 1,197,577 residents. A ZIP code is compared here only if it carries a resident count to weight it by and enough measured data on that domain — the rest are left out of that domain’s fifths rather than filled in from a coarser geography, which is why this count can sit just below the metro’s scored total.

The mark shows 20% — where a row would sit if that domain were spread evenly across the metro's residents.

Each ZIP code is compared with the other ZIP codes in this metro that are measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Why this matters

The ZipVitals Score combines nine domains of health — from chronic disease and preventive care to environmental hazard, social need, and healthcare access — into one 0–100 index for each ZIP code, computed the same way everywhere from public federal and academic data. The Salt Lake City-Murray, UT figures on this page are population-weighted rollups of those per-ZIP scores, so they describe the metro's residents rather than a coarser geography relabeled as the metro.

A high score describes favorable documented conditions; it is not a claim about individual residents, and it does not capture everything that shapes a community's health. Where a ZIP code scores low, that pattern reflects structural conditions — investment, environment, and access — far more than the choices of the people who live there.